User talk:Abreles

Welcome!

Hello, Abreles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! _{Adotchar| reply here} 00:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madame quernizan (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madame quernizan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Abreles, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 00:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Whispering. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of computer scientists have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Whispe ring 01:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Contents/Philosophy and thinking/Intro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

I have reverted two of your edits that added these pointless walls of text ([1] and [2]). Please don't do that again or you'll be blocked by an admin from editing. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lists of writers. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of possible edit warring on List of computer scientists

Your recent editing history at List of computer scientists shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you keep adding a person that is not notable, as you did at List of computer scientists, List of authors by name: A, and List of Haitian artists. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nthep (talk) 22:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After being blocked for disruptive editing three days ago, on the expiry of the block you resume the same course of nonsense edits which leads me to the conclusion that either you are being deliberately disruptive or you lack the competence required to edit Wikipedia. Nthep (talk) 22:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Abreles/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Abreles/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:2601:586:C380:221A:A149:648B:C9E1:9827/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:2601:586:C380:221A:A149:648B:C9E1:9827/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Madame quernizan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Madame quernizan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Abreles/Guensly Joseph Duvalier marie CARLINE piquion pierre et marie curie Wil van der Aalst

Hello, Abreles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guensly Joseph Duvalier marie CARLINE piquion pierre et marie curie Wil van der Aalst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ―Susmuffin ^Talk 01:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]