User talk:Akshay2197
May 2015
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Venkat International Public School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Venkat International Public School was changed by Akshay2197 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950438 on 2015-05-29T08:52:08+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. You have been given instructions on how to request an unblock, and just creating a new account to get round the block is not how to do it. If necessary, the article you have been editing can be protected to prevent editing, but this would cause inconvenience to legitimate editors as well as you, so please don't make that necessary. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. |
Akshay2197 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't have any other wikimedia account. I am ready to give my scanned documents for verification of my account. Akshay2197 (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Textbook WP:DUCK sockpuppetry. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am not sure how scanned documents would prove that you haven't used any other accounts. Also, you can probably imagine why it seems that you have used other accounts, considering the following facts:
- This account was created shortly after another account was blocked, and proceeded to edit only the article which that other account had been editing.
- There are similarities between the edits made by the two accounts, including both accounts repeatedly removing the same maintenance tags, and both accounts adding the same image (which, incidentally, was uploaded by another single-purpose account that edited the same article in a promotional way and was then blocked).
- Just over an hour after this account was blocked, yet another account was created, and the only substantial edits by that account have been to the same article, together with some trivial but highly suspicious looking edits elsewhere. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- ... and now number 4. The owner of that last account has now posted a talk page message referring to a revert of his or her past editing, but no such revert had ever happened to any edit by that account. However, the message makes perfect sense if it refers to edits by the account Akshay2197, because it did have exactly relevant edits reverted. It looked like a duck before, but it now looks blindingly like a duck. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)