User talk:Albanian Historian

Welcome

Hello, Albanian Historian, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! /wia /talk 20:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhuj Selmani (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zhuj Selmani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /talk 20:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Albanian Historian, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /talk 20:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zhuj Selmani

Hello, Albanian Historian. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Zhuj Selmani".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 19:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zhuj Selmani has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zhuj Selmani. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhuj Selmani has been accepted

Zhuj Selmani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP Albania

You may want to check out WikiProject Albania, where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians interested in the subject. MB298 (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi Albanian Historian. Great initiative and good job for the new articles.
Two things:

Try to find references (especially books rather than internet web pages) to support the material you add, otherwise the content may be challenged or the article "tagged" which makes it of little value.
Do not upload images (pics, photos, drawings) that you find in internet with the license you have been using so far. The license refers to the original creator and not to the user who uploads it. As you can see, they are being tagged for deletion. Upload them in English WP, not Commons. Upload them as "Fair use" not "own work". If you choose "fair use", the pic can be used in a specific article for informative purposes. Choose the option "historical event or deceased person" in addition to fair use. Intellectual property has to be respected. If you're not sure, just ask. Leave a message at other users' talk pages.

Go to WP:SQ and see other articles, and related users.

It takes patience! --Mondiad (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for your comment! I am new to Wiki and i will try to improve myself.

Zef Kol Ndoka has no references. Please reference it, otherwise someone can take it to deletion. For googlebooks referencing refer to my userpage. There is a link there (called "References for books"). If you click on it, it will bring you to a page where you can add the url at the top, and it will give you the reference at the bottom. "Zefi i vogel", unfortunately doesn't appear in any inline googlebooks, so I was wondering if you would have anything that is offline. Offline sources are welcome in Wikipedia, and good faith is assumed. If you need help, kindly let me know. You can also email me the sources and I can reference. Best! --MorenaReka (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oso Kuka

Great work on finding Konica's magazine!
Mos u merzit per fotot qe do fshihen se keto jane gjera qe ndodhin. Kryesisht cfare eshte publikuar para 1923 mund te ngarkohet pa merak. Po te duash, leave a message on my talk page or someone's else, in case you're not sure which license to choose.
Shiko te marresh ca material nga Albania e Konices dhe ta shtosh te artikulli. Se artikulli eshte ende i shkurter.
Great work, dhe mos u merzit!
--Mondiad (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Falminderit shoku! --Albanian Historian (talk) 08:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Albanian Historian[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Zhuj Selmani

added links pointing to Peja, Rugova and Plav

Bislim Bajgora

added a link pointing to Unknown

Uprising of Lume

added a link pointing to Luma

Zef Kol Ndoka

added a link pointing to Unknown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uprising of Luma

Great work!
Just keep in mind the licenses that we discussed. Don't include pictures or artwork from living people, as it is their own intellectual property and we can't include them without a special permit.
Also, the first image in the infobox (Albanian rebels somewhere in Luma in 1912) shows Bajram Curri with his fighters, I don't think it is taken in Luma. We can use the other "Albanian rebels" image you placed down there. Let me know.
I will fix the references and some content. But keep editing the article so it comes to a better shape, and you know how is done for next time as well.
--Mondiad (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! I will try to improve it. --Albanian Historian (talk) 09:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Albanian Historian[reply]

Anti-Slavic sentiment

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Anti-Slavic sentiment. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Zoupan 16:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

“

Anti-Slavism was widely spread in Kosovo (Back then Dardania) since medieval times when the Serbian kingdom invaded Dardania (ancient illyrian tribe consisting of modern day Kosovo) and Northern Albania in the 12th century. The Albanians had previously been orthodox from the Byzantine faith but were encouraged to convert to the Catholic faith to resist Slavic assimilation. Together with Europes Catholic Monks, they strongly opposed Orthooxism seeing it as a Slavic faith. When the East–West Schism occured, in 1054, the Northern Albanians and Dardanians remained under the Roman Catholic church and the Albanians south remained Orthodox under Constantinopel (modern day Istanbul). The Serbs massconverted the Albanians of Dardania to the Orthodox faith, destroyed Catholic churches and made them into Orthodox ones. In order to colonize the the occupied regions, many churches were built that had been originally been Albanian Catholic ones. Albanians were babtized at birth, given slavic names, were tought serbian, etc. Tsar Dusan also had a racist and anti-albanian polticis. He hated the "Arabanska vera" which translates to "the Albanian faith" refering to Catholicism seeing it as his biggest enemy. Serb villagers were forbidden to help Albanians who passed by and anyone who did help them were fined or imprisoned. Albanians and Vlachs were seen as second-hand citizens and serb villagers were forbidden to help any Albanian at all. When the Ottoman Empire occupied Kosovo, Albanians eventually started converting to Islam, due to high taxes and violence but also in order to resist serb assimilation. By the 16th century, most Albanians in Kosovo had converted to Islam and an Ottomans used the Albanians hate against the Serbs to drive them out and re-colonize the once Albanian Kosovo. Thousands of serbs fled during the Great Serb migration and many Albanians returned as the rightful owners of their homes in Kosovo. Austro-Hungaria fueld the anti-slav politics of Albanians during the 18th century as a mean to stop the pro-Russian Serbia from reaching a port to the Adriatic sea. Ottoman Empire were allied with Austro-Hungaria in this case. When Serbia became independent in 1813, thousands of Albanians were murdered and others were expelled from modern day Nish and Kurshumli (south Serbia, back then Vilayet of Kosovo, Ottoman Empire). Albanians were caught between anti-ottoman and anti-slav thoughts and allying with one only led to the other progressing. The Balkan war of 1912 increased the Anti-Slavism as the Serbian and Montenegrin army committed numerous massacres of Albanian civilians in Kosovo, Shkodra and Macedonia.

”

— User:Albanian Historian, at Anti-Slavism (diff)

Wooooow. I just had to make you a fitting quote box. This is real poetry. Did you actually think this one through?--Zoupan 16:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Anti-Slavic sentiment. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --Zoupan 15:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Stop this behaviour.--Zoupan 15:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zoupan:, please don't put words in other users' mouth which they never said. The whole "quote" above is not from User:Albanian Historian. The paragraph which you copy-pasted from somewhere (assuming one of his edits) doesn't mean "he said it". If you consider his content and sources as non-reliable, then there are procedures how to address them and it is very easy.

@Albanian Historian:, you are a new user. Don't engage immediately in sharp topics. Go to the talk page and open a discussion there. If you see that your edits were reverted, still go to the talk page and open a discussion and ask what was wrong. Everything takes patience. If you don't know how to do something, just ask.--Mondiad (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hi, try to create smaller articles and less complicated. Leave the big topics for later...I.e., the articles for Zhuj Selmani was ok. And you need to work it a little, cause automatic translation is not enough. Even if you create them, they will be tagged as "problematic", which makes them of little value. --Mondiad (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Expulsion of Albanians

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Expulsion of Albanians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoupan 05:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.--Zoupan 14:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source misinterpretation

Hi,

I noticed that you added text (link):

"Muslim Albanians represented a third of the population of the areas of Nish, Kurshumli, Leskovac, Vranje, and Prokuplje in 1877."

The source (link) says:

Muslims represented a third of the population of these areas in 1877.

With this edit you misinterpreted source. Please be so kind to try not to repeat this kind of disruption in future. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gusinje

Yes, from the word "Guci" or "Puci" meaning "flash" or "flashlight" referring to a strategic position. The source is reliable. If you cannot provide counter-sources, then this discussion is over. Edits are made with sources and proper arguments, not nationalist editing with nothing to back it up with.

--Albanian Historian (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really believe that the toponym of Gusinje is derived from the Albanian word for "flashlight"? No. It is not. Stop using low-quality ultra-nationalistic sites for your POV, you have already been warned on your behaviour.--Zoupan 17:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard thread

There is a thread regarding you at the Administrators' noticeboard.--Zoupan 18:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do comment there. So far I see you using poor sources, edit warring, and being quite rude to editors who disgree with your desired edits. I'm a inch from blocking you as too combative to waste time working with. Please explain (on WP:ANI why you should not be blocked for your behavior. Killer Chihuahua 18:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for one hour for violating WP:NPA. Please use the time to read the following:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

Killer Chihuahua 18:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in The Expulsion of Albanians

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page The Expulsion of Albanians, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. larryv (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

prod tags

In my opinion, you were well within your rights to remove a prod tag.According to WP:PROD and [[WP:Deletion policy}}, you may remove a tag if you object to deletion ...for any reason. Anyone may still take the article to AfD. I have no opinion on the underlying issue. DGG ( talk ) 15:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.--Zoupan 13:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zoupan, that applies to speedy. It does not apply to prod. Even the original editor may remove a Prod. Please re-check WP:PROD an WP:Deletion policy; make sure you are in the right section. DGG ( talk ) 15:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DGG my apologies, you're right.--Zoupan 15:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zoupan, no blame in that--the rules are remarkably confusing, having been added at various times without coordination, and thee is no easy way to learnt hem all--in fact, learning them all is probably beyond human capability--or at least mine. DGG ( talk ) 16:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ndoc Mark Gega

Shiko ta permirsosh pak Ndoc Mark Gegan. Duke ndrequr dhe meson. Shiko psh artikullin e Sefe Koshares.

Tung.--Mondiad (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Athenean (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sak Faslia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peja and Rugova. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of The Battle of Plava and Gusinje

A tag has been placed on The Battle of Plava and Gusinje requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Zoupan 14:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Dušan

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Stefan Dušan, you may be blocked from editing. --Zoupan 21:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are references given to it, if you don't like that, bring it up to a discussion board and explain why the references are faulty then... --Albanian Historian (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. Read the warning. As for the references, I'm afraid Hasan Jashari doesn't look reliable, he cites no sources (?) and his paper is utterly Albanian-centred. Durham is not the least reliable. You can't compare entries in 14th-century law books to the present. You have no scholarly understanding of Dušan's Code nor the social state of medieval countries, so don't try to interpret it. You are keen on displaying the Serbian people as racists. Stop it.--Zoupan 21:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, none of those references even mention the word "racism". Anyway, you two should start discussing the issue at the article talk page immediately. Edit-warring is never an answer. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Revert the one i did, i accidentally did it. Zhoupan, after you.--Albanian Historian (talk) 22:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of ancient tribes in Illyria. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 07:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert about the Balkans

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Dr. K. 07:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Novi Pazar

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Novi Pazar, you may be blocked from editing. --Zoupan 11:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change the edits without constructive arguments, please. --Albanian Historian (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your revision has been reverted by two users (1, 2) with the same conclusion. Read the guidelines. It is not appropriate to misrepresent/change what references say according to your own POV. No argument is needed to counter this. Comparison:--Zoupan 12:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source	You
One journalist reported that when the Serbian Ibar Army,under General Zivkovich, marched into the Sandjak of Novi Pazar, it pacified the Albanian population living there under old principle, “soletudinem facient, pacem appelant.”	In 1912, when the invading Serbian Ivan army entered Novi Pazar, General Zivkovich ordered the massacre all the Albanian inhabitants under the principle of "solitudinem facing pacem appellant".

The quote refers to massacring them! So it is no fraud but since you insist, then i shall add exactly what the quote says.

--Albanian Historian (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, You should not add exactly what it says. You have been warned for Copyright violations. Please read the many guidelines.--Zoupan 19:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ahmet Delia

added a link pointing to Prekaz

Tahir Meha

added a link pointing to Kulla

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wp:3rr violation

I've noticed you have breached the 3 revert rule in Dardani. I kindly ask you to self-revert and initiate a discussion in the correspondent talkpage. Else you leave me no choice but to report this kind of disruption.Alexikoua (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Albanian_Historian reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you. Dr. K. 21:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Dardani

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Albanian Historian reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've checked your record more thoroughly, I suspect that you ought to be banned from all edits regarding the Balkans. I'll let this go for now, and am hoping that you will show you can edit more neutrally in the future. You've received lots of warnings and they seem to have made no impression whatsoever. EdJohnston (talk) 02:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for what? That i add references which indeed are reliable? I'd like a third part to judge this. --Albanian Historian (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albanian Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I contribute enough with proper sources and references, i see not why a block would be necessary. Its pointless. I want to know why my references are not reliable, so far you've failed to show me. It is not enough to say "Its an unreliable source". Who is to judge that? And if there is to be a block, i'd like to state my opinion first, with several editors to judge said accusation. My previous warnings has been due to image-related copyright violations to which i've learned and improved. I want this block lifted and i want the editors who state that my edits are violations to prove WHY they are, and not simply state that the references are unreliable.

The Dardania, as properly referenced by a third party, is not unreliable. I want an explanation and this block lifted as its not even giving me a chance. THANK YOU. Albanian Historian (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for edit warring. Whether you're right or not, that's disruptive and not permitted. Huon (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry

Hello, Albanian Historian, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Cunmulaj (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

You were blocked for 48 hours in 02:08, 11 Feb on WP. You were blocked indef on Commons in 13:42, 11 Feb. Not knowing if you'd be unblocked, you created another account. Cunmulaj (talk · contribs · logs) pops up on Commons (09:22–13.32, 13 Feb) and adds media on WP (09:22–11.31, 13 Feb), with same type of uploads (See Commons:Special:ListFiles/Cunmulaj). The uploads are as the tradition, claimed to be CC0.--Zoupan 20:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Albanias Golgotha 1912

Hello Albanian Historian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Albanias Golgotha 1912 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 19:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Albanian Historian

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your use/abuse of sockpuppets/multiple accounts to upload copyright violations at Commons and then you using the copyvios at English Wikipedia. The thread is Albanian Historian. Thank you. Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albanian Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fail to understand why the images i upload are copyrighted when they are not?? The photos are over 70 years old, and many photos loose their copyright? But i guess i must read the rules better, and if so, i apologize for violating the rules. I simply try to improve the quality of the articles i add by adding photos, but since i have difficulties with this, i must improve it then. Could i have a date when the ban might be lifted, if it is lifted? Thank you for your response. It is not my intention to spam, i like to think i make many contributions to Wikipedia, many which often requires hours of translation. I want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, and i promise i will improve my editing, and read the rules better.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for the misuse of multiple accounts (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kadribistrica), and an unblock request that does not address that can not be accepted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Albanian Historian (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, i'd like to apologize for using multiple accounts. It was unintentional, although I did not know it was against the rules until after. I will improve my behaviour and my articles.

--Albanian Historian (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make an unblock request on whichever was your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this is the original account. --Albanian Historian (talk) 18:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then make a new unblock request here, addressing your use of multiple accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment to the claim of not knowing it was against the rules. In the thread #Sockpuppetry above another user warned Albanian Historian just before I had planned to do the same. That was 13 Feb. The account Cunmulaj was used on Commons 19 Feb, and the account 435rapo14 was initiated on Commons 20 Feb. --T*U (talk) 20:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to make a new unblock request regarding my use of multiple accounts. --Albanian Historian (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To make a new unblock request, you just use the {{unblock}} template again. Be sure to read the guide to appealing blocks carefully. --T*U (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian, the problem with the images you uploaded is that they are copyrighted. It is a derivative work of a public domain material (see COM:DW). I say it is a derivative work because it is a photograph of a public domain content. Even though the main subject is a public domain material, it is still not in the public domain, as we still need the permission from the photographer. If you want to help in Albanian history, try not getting images from blogs, but scan old pictures (yes, scans of public domain material are not copyrighted, as they are not original enough). And once you have a decent understanding of derivative works and copyright, you may request unblock here and at Commons. Thanks, Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kadri Bistrica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kadri Bistrica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadri Bistrica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Expulsion of Albanians 1877-1878 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Expulsion of Albanians 1877-1878 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Expulsion of Albanians 1877-1878 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Axiomus (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albanian Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to apologize for violating the rules of Wikipedia. I am guilty of socket-pupping and i regret not reading the rules properly. As i have donated prevously and spent a lot of time here, i wish to be granted another chance. I believe i have much to contribute with and it would be a shame of this was what stopped me. I want to continue to contribute and donate. I've learned this the hard way. I would also like to adress that i've read the rules of copyright violations and will not repeat myself, such as uploading protected material. --Albanian Historian (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm declining this request for now, but you are given the WP:STANDARDOFFER. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Albanian Historian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]