User talk:Alexis Jhon Gaspar

Alexis Jhon Gaspar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Alexis Jhon Gaspar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 24 Oras Weekend

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 24 Oras Weekend. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 24 Oras: Weekend Edition. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 24 Oras: Weekend Edition – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Parkywiki (talk) 08:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 23 (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:23 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello, Alexis Jhon Gaspar, and welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you recently added yourself to the list of Teahouse hosts. I presume that this was a mistake, and that you meant to add yourself to the list of guests? You can do that at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Guests. Let me know if you need any further assistance. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have now added a duplicate entry to the host list. I am going to presume that these additions are in error and will remove them. Please reply here or at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions if you need assistance. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi, Alexis Jhon Gaspar, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages. -- HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi <font color="Tear" face="Tahoma" HJ Mitchell Thank you Very Much for Message and Forgiving your Sentence and Maybe asking Wikipedia Thank You.

Alexis Jhon Gaspar (talk) 10:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Opera4.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Opera4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logos

I have removed the non-free logos from your user page, as they are not allowed except in article space, see WP:NFCC#9. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User en-6

Template:User en-6, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User en-6 (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User en-6 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waterfirefox 100x100.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waterfirefox 100x100.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waterfirefox.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waterfirefox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Firefoxicon106p.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Firefoxicon106p.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Waterfoxicon100p.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Waterfoxicon100p.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 09:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logos

Please do not add logos that you have uploaded as non-free into templates. Non-free logos are only allowed in articles, not templates or on userpages. You must also read up on how to correctly upload non-free images WP:NFCC, this talk page is littered with warnings about images that are not correctly attributed and subject to deletion. That said a number of the files you have uploaded are free images that already exist on Wikipedia or Commons and you can freely use those in your userboxes but please read how to correctly size images within the userboxes. It would also be nice to see you make some contributions to the encyclopedia and edit some articles - so far all your edits are either to your user page or creating userboxes and while that is all interesting, it is not the main function of Wikipedia. Nthep (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making the same mistake by reinserting non-free images into templates or userboxes. Nthep (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you didn't notice the previous messages. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Firefoxicon106p.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Firefoxicon106p.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waterfoxicon100p.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waterfoxicon100p.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nthep (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to have to do this but you have numerous warnings and advice to read the image use policy, especially as it relates to the use of non-free images, and you have taken no notice. During the period of your block I suggest you read the relevant pages because if you continue editing in the same way once your block has expired you will be re-blocked and the duration will be longer. Nthep (talk) 14:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexis Jhon Gaspar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont Blocked forgive and Dont violateAlexis Jhon Gaspar (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No Bots

Nobots

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:WaresA/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 24 Oras Weekend, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 24 Oras Weekend for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 24 Oras Weekend is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Oras Weekend until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Biddulph (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:24OrasWeekend.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:24OrasWeekend.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logos again!

You are just back off one block for disruptive editing involving misuse of non-free images and immediately you are repeating the same behaviour again. You do not appear to have read or understood any of the previous warnings or links you have been provided. Take this as a final warning, DO NOT use non-free images like screenshots of News Patrol or 24 Ora in userbox templates. If I see you doing this again I will block you again and it will be for a longer period than before. Nthep (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo image uploads

If you need one uploaded, please come to me and I will help. Please, please, do not upload anything anymore unless you are absolutely sure what you are doing. I don't want to see you blocked again. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Google Chrome Canary 45x45px.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Google Chrome Canary 45x45px.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned not to upload anymore files without proper licensing information, then proceeded to do so anyway. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Alexis Jhon Gaspar/AJbot

User:Alexis Jhon Gaspar/AJbot, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexis Jhon Gaspar/AJbot and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Alexis Jhon Gaspar/AJbot during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 09:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexis Jhon Gaspar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

SorryAlexis Jhon Gaspar (talk) 10:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Just saying sorry is insufficient. Please explain what you were doing wrong and tell us how you plan to change your editing if you are unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:23

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:23, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexis Jhon Gaspar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Richee I am Sorry to Non-free image at userboxes violence I am not repeat anymore anytime I am So Sorry. Alexis Jhon Gaspar (talk) 08:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2nd.1st unblock

{{unblock| reason=Like unblock me,by nytep, I am not again and again volate them and I dont Blocked forgive and Dont violate [[User:Alexis Jhon Gaspar|Alexis Jhon Gaspar]] ([[User talk:Alexis Jhon Gaspar#top|talk]]) 10:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)}}

2nd.1st unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexis Jhon Gaspar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Like unblock me,by nytep, I am not again and again volate them Alexis Jhon Gaspar (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you have been told repeatedly that you need to address the reason for your block, and as you have repeatedly ignored this, I have revoked your talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. If you appeal there, I very, very strongly advise you to follow the instructions you've been given. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, User:WaresA/sandbox

Hello, Alexis Jhon Gaspar. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 13:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]