User talk:Alishah85

Welcome!

Hello, Alishah85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 21:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

WikiProject Afghanistan

We invite you to join WikiProject Afghanistan. There you can also find and coordinate with users who are trying to improve Afghanistan-related articles. If you would like to get involved, just visit the members page or inquire at the project's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or other members of the WikiProject Afghanistan.

Hey there! I would like to invite you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Afghanistan (and maybe Wikipedia:WikiProject Pashtun if you're interested). Just know, that if you have any questions, feel free to contact me and I'll guide you with the best of my abilities. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 05:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but i am not sure how, can you check if i did it right.

Thanks again for your invitation.

Alishah85 (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did it correctly, thanks! Soon insha'Allah I'll have updated information so it will become easier to coordinate articles on Afghanistan. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 06:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just try to cite using news and books, that way no one can revert you for having bad sources. I have joined the conversation on our poet's page. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 07:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dear pashtun I did my best, and these guys still are not satisfied. have a look at it its a mess. Alishah85 (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nawid Orakzai

A tag has been placed on Nawid Orakzai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Parler Vous (edits) 07:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Living people - ethnicity

Thank you for requesting a citation for the ethnicity of Aziz Herawi. However, you should make yourself aware of the Wikipedia guidelines about living persons. In particular, see Wikipedia:Citing sources#When adding material to the biography of a living person where is says "If you find unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about a living person—whether in an article or on a talk page—remove it immediately! Do not leave it in the article while you request a source." See also my summary comments about ethnic statements in general at the bottom of Talk:Aziz Herawi#Tajik?. I appreciate your polite discussion on that talk page. --Bejnar (talk) 20:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bejnar you are one those few most hard-working intelligent person. I admire your work, and your honesty. Its people like you who make sure, people around here don't give dirt to wikipedia, and make sure wikipedia earns its respect through you people, and because of people like you are your hard-works is the reason so much of information is available to us for free. Thanks for your kind comments. Unfortunately some people just never understand, and don't appropriate what's available to us today was never before. Its really hard to control so many people with their so many backgrounds, ways of thinkings etc etc, continue in trying to upset people, lie and change facts into BS just to make themselves feel comfortable.

I can see you are really putting your time and hard-work in the articles relating Afghanistan. I am a member of Afghan Association Of Canada, living in Toronto. In past we have been asked to help putting volunteer time with Wikipedia.org, because so much things were said wrong and not from Afghan prospective sometimes really against the facts, as we have noticed the society loves free stuff and wikipedia offers many subjects in many fields, since then its fame has been unstoppable. I just want to let you know we Afghans in Toronto, like many others, appropriate bright people like yourself in the wikipedia org. I will try my best.

Again Thank you.

bye.

Alishah85 (talk) 01:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd like to suggest that you review the WP:MOS and WP:YFA pages. You're writing about someone in a very promotional tone, yet it doesn't explain why the subject is notable for inclusion here. Thanks. Hope this helps. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but he was important person specially to those fans who listen to songs of Jawid Sharif, Omar Sharif and Rameen Sharif. He was really behind them and a master of what those persons have become. The article regarding him also solves many problems such their origin and their musics. etc.

Anyways thanks i thought it was important enough to exist in Wikipedia since there are many other articles that can be linked which his name is hyperlinked.

bye

Alishah85 (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pashtun tribes

Good job on all the work you've been doing! I actually hope we can document all the Pashtun tribes and have information for them. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 08:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sister I was wondering can you please check my user name. I was referred to as "Suckpuppet". some new user has placed this tag and also i was just hopping around when i found this same "Suckpuppet" under another user User:Afghan25 and many others which is also applied by User:Tajik. Can you tell me if a person's IP can be checked also I was wonder its the same 3 people whom always changing everything to non-sense, now I am wonder if they are a gang or something. It would be dangerous to deal with such people. Anyways thanks dear. My job is to make wikipedia a better web source for all of us. but goosh these people even change reference, i wonder how come they don't get banned.

Anyways bye dear

Alishah85 (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If they continue to use false sources, we can report them to an administrator. And if someone calls you a sockpuppet and an administrator takes them seriously, the administrator will check the IP, so don't worry, you'll be fine. For now, let's remain calm, and if we see these people further pushing an agenda we can report them to administrators. Tajik is a good editor, so he should eventually leave you alone. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 09:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please avoid an edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Beltoon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of sockpuppetry

The first thing is to take a deep breath and relax some of the tension. Part of the "game" that some users play is to accuse new editors whose edits are not in accord with their POV as being a sockpuppet of a banned user. See, for example, the accusation against me at Talk:Hotaki dynasty#Bejnar.2C a socket-puppet of Dilbar. Please relax, let any anger go away. Don't edit when you are angry, often such charges are made in order to "get your goat" and cause you to violate Wikipedia policy. Nevertheless, always be polite, and where possible assume that the other editor is operating from a noble motive. Based on the nature of your edits that I have seen (admittedly only a few), you are not a sockpuppet of anyone. The first article to read is Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. You asked me to check a couple of things, some of which I may not be able to do since I am not an administrator, but I will have to put it off until, probably tomorrow. Meanwhile, stay cool. --Bejnar (talk) 16:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser has confirmed that User:Banigul was a sockpuppet of banned User:NisarKand. The same checkuser file seems to confirm that Alishah85 is a sockpuppet. Tājik (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is that checkuser file? --Bejnar (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kharkuss pathetic tajik, the check user just says Likely, it doesn't say confirm, you uneducated kussmoder. What this means is that NisarKand and Banigul are both in the same city but on different ISP. I'm NisarKand and I didn't use Banigul name, the admin who banned him is checking this out. Banigul edits things I wouldn't even bother with. I only assume he is Pashtun, and at first I thought it was the other loser, beh-nam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzbak (talk • contribs) 11:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what you do when these same 2-3 guys continually changes your home page? By placing that same "Sockpuppet" Tag?.Alishah85 (talk) 18:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just let other editors remove it. --Bejnar (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bejnar, the person who used annon IPs starting with 88 and 84 to vandalise your user page is Tajik from Germany. I hope you realize that. This Tajik is the mastermind of trouble making here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzbak (talk • contribs) 16:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Ahad Wardak

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Abdul Ahad Wardak, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wardak.de/famous-wardak/famous_wardaks.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page.

CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You don't want to be invovlved in edit warring, let others take care of the Khalilullah Khalili article. --Bejnar (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Ok Thanks dear but how do we report the IP I mean I know this IP User:71.107.11.87 which he just changed some few other pages, making it all next to non-sense. I don't know his motives or his background or the reasonings of his changes so many times Wikipedia members have asked him for sources and not even once he replys with a source, he just annoys everyone. For example just check one of the changes he made just at 10:15, 23 January 2009 in the Khalilullah Khalili he removed all the sources, and references and continued with his own BS which i have no idea Why he would delete stuff and make up thing. Anyways I wish i knew how to report him. Cause he seems very very lost.[reply]

Alishah85 (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported the IP. Hopefully he will be blocked soon and no longer edit, insha'Allah. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 01:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sister, Just check his contribution he makes no such improvements, I don't care about blocking people or anything but seriously I get tired of these members, specially when they have no reasons for the changes they make or claim. Right now the user continues to change Ahmad Zahir, Khalilullah Khalili, Rameen Sharif, Arash Howaida, Jawid Sharif etc etc. Pages which i last changed, are all reverted by these 2 guys seem like they are taking it all too personal, but this last user who made the changes to the above pages seems not to care at all, i kindly advised and asked for sources many times, I don't mind changes, everything or on anything but at least he should show that they care, ie by providing sources, or at least don't delete source provided and yet its all ignored. Well As Bejnar has suggested I shell not continue with them 2-3 persons seems so aggressive, and continuously changing and complaining about me being as being sockpuppet of a guy named Beh-nam with this tag {sockpuppetproven|Beh-nam}. I tried to look at some of his contributions to see what makes him think that this Beh-nam is the same person as I am. Believe me I was lost my self. Anyways thanks for your concern.

Bye

Alishah85 (talk) 04:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Oh BTW I just found another thing about this user Beh-nam in the article of Nainawaz in this article where I made some clean up and clarification, some few days ago. Looking at its history, its amazing how users would just assume stuff, based on the languages the person speaks. Specially when the users are not Afghans but from neighboring countries, such as from Iran or Turkistan. I too can prove this that this Beh-nam wasn't even Afghan, I mean look at his edits from the Article Nainawaz at 18:51, 19 August 2007. The guy seems to be the master behind coming up with the word "Afghanistani", and the theory of labeling Farsiwans as "Tajik" and see from Beh-nam's contributions to how supportive the users who labeled me as "Beh-nam". this is indeed surprising. What kind of Afghan would that be to support the word "Afghanistani" and how does my contributions and my reactions fit with his ideas? Funny indeed[reply]

Alishah85 (talk) 06:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC) bye Alishah85 (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam was an old anti-Pashtun editor, I believe he was a Farsiwan. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 07:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sister Please don't say this I am also a Farsiwan. Alishah85 (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam was an old anti-Pashtun editor, I believe he was a Farsiwan. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 07:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sister I don't think he was Afghan at all. What-ever he was he was anti-Afghan. Alishah85 (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Nisarkan and I just wanna say first that I've given up editing here long ago. I was forced to come to explain to the admins that I am not Banigul. I also want to explain to you something...beh-nam (Farsiwan) was born in Germany and now lives in Canada. He is probably a non-muslim, I know him in other sites and chat rooms. His latest sock User:Muxlim is proof, he wants to say with that name that he is ex-muslim. Beh-nam was very stupid for turning that way, he is filled with lots of hate. User:Tajik is another extreme hater, he says the most nasty things you can imagine about Pashtuns. Tajik uses IPs starting with 82, 84 and 88. Do not be fooled, it's 100% him when you see those IPs edit-warring or writing anti-Pashtun stuff. That IP starting with 71 is tajik and beh-nam's buddy Mohammad Fahim Khairy, a crippled guy from Balkh province who now lives in USA as a refugee. This here is his anti-Afghanistan blog site beh-nam and tajik usually leave comments there. By the way, tajik and beh-nam are very ugly looking dudes, tajik looks like a monkey and beh-nam looks like a mongol. I've seen both, and the blogger is also a mongol looking crippled guy. Ugly people are usually always the trouble makers, lol.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzbak (talk • contribs) 11:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Award!

		Barnstar of National Merit of Afghanistan
		I, Pashtun Ismailiyya, award you the Barnstar of National Merit of Afghanistan for your work in preserving over Five thousand years of history and heritage for Afghanistan.

You've earned it, you've been very patient and put large amounts of effort into improving articles! Generally on Wikipedia, these awards are put on your user page. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 08:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

woe thanks sister it was very kind of you. Its a very special feeling when someone is awarded. I hope in the future i can put more time effort in the articles related to Afghanistan. Thanks alot dear :)

bye

Alishah85 (talk) 11:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pashtun tribe

Are you a member of a Pashtun tribe? Which? --♥pashtun ismailiyya 07:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Dear Sister to be Honest I care less about my tribe, What's important for me is nationhood, Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and unity. What I don't like is extremests, terrorists, and communists. Anyways since you asked, I belong Sahak clan. I was told by uncle that Sahaks mainly live in Kabulistan, in the area of Lalandar (15 mins from the capital Kabul), and members also in Sari-Ap, and Jonobi, with some 60,000 people altogether, and our village Lalandar had the highest number. So that's what i know of my background.Alishah85 (talk) 07:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nilufer Tarzi

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nilufer Tarzi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nilufer Tarzi seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nilufer Tarzi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hafizullah Wardak

A tag has been placed on Hafizullah Wardak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Bdb484 (talk) 06:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shafiq Mureed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shafiq Mureed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shafiq Mureed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

pandakekok9 (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammad Nabi Safi

The article Mohammad Nabi Safi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Really outdated, can’t find anything on google for this. Only one sentence and one source. Not that notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]