User talk:Allforrous

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mycterus curculioides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olivier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Silphidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Macromiidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tillyard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Berberis microphylla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnoliidae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anubhav Mohanty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arcade Game Cards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Check, Tickets and Arcade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Allforrous. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage picture

Dear Allforrous: could you please remove or at least explain why there's a photo of myself in your userpage? Some people are confused because they think this could be my user account -which is not. Thanks, Patricio.lorente (talk) 11:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cheurfa Tizi Tegyar

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Allforrous, thanks for creating Cheurfa Tizi Tegyar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to the article so its content can be verified by the reader.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 14:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Allforrous. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

high heels

I took off Female taller than men — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.26.36 (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why do you keep adding [*[1]- Improving Strategic Management this site] into the Strategic Management article -----Snowded ^TALK 11:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the question. The number of edits you have on wikipedia does not entitle you to add promotional material -----Snowded ^TALK 22:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons no es promocional. --Allforrous 23:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

But the link I gave you is -----Snowded ^TALK 23:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help request for mapping section titles

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-01, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help request for mapping section titles

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-15, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eyarth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Eyarth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. L293D (☎ • ✎) 22:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Allforrous. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Allforrous. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boca Juniors Reserves and Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cristian Chávez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Computation of radiowave attenuation in the atmosphere

An article that you have been involved in editing—Computation of radiowave attenuation in the atmosphere—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 14:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your strategy ... is wrong, I'm afraid

I see that you are following the strategy of taking an article on X, and marking Commons Category:X on all the images that were in the article. This might sometimes help, but it fails badly when an article has various tangential aspects which are illustrated. The logic Y is-aspect-of X and I illustrates Y therefore I belongs to category X is WRONG. For the second time today, please STOP doing this - it is causing a lot of work to UNDO your random guesses! Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To practice in psychology you need an enabling degree. --Allforrous (talk) 19:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing psychology, I'm saying that I've had to do the practical thing of undoing a whole lot of your edits as they were wrong. It looked as if you were making those edits by following the strategy I've outlined above, which would give exactly the observed results. Whatever the reason for your edits of the kind described, I'd be extremely grateful if you stopped. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Cultural depictions of dinosaurs

Category:Cultural depictions of dinosaurs has been nominated for merging with Category:Dinosaurs in popular culture. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commonscat

What is the purpose of editing a page only to change {{Commons category}} to {{Commonscat}}? This change in wikitext does not result in any change of the rendered page. Senator2029 “Talk” 01:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I came here to say the same thing. Don't replace a template with a more confusing redirect to it. MClay1 (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Container categories

I've reverted your addition of {{Container}} to several categories, including Category:21st-century Brazilian poets, Category:Jewish history by city, and Category:Mexican telenovela actresses. Please make note of the definition of a container category before adding that template. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of an image doesn't necessarily imply categorisation

Allforrous, it's plain we don't see eye to eye on some issues; that's fine, there's room for many points of view here.

However, on one specific matter it'd be worth trying to agree. When an image is used in an article, it can be for many reasons.

1) A portrait of John Doe in his article certainly does imply, as it's clear both of us believe, that a potential Category:John Doe would make sense, and might (if there are enough files to put there) be worth creating. I happen to think that number should certainly be larger than 3 before one sets up all that apparatus, but at least I can grant that the category is not utterly illogical.

2) John Doe visits a city, or reads a book, or speaks to an institution, or ... whatever, and the article's editor sees fit to include an image of that city, book, institution or whatever. However, Doe visited many cities, read many books ... the presence of the image is no evidence at all that the Category:John Doe is appropriate for the image of the city, book, etc. It simply doesn't follow.

3) John Doe practices only Ruritanian Yoga which consists entirely of standing on his head in full ceremonial robes, chanting in Sanskrit, accompanied only by men aged over 50 similarly dressed. He writes often about the wickedness of yoga poses practiced by young women wearing skimpy clothing. The article's editor selects at random a photo of a young blonde woman doing a standing yoga pose in skimpy shorts and crop top to support the point, citing a scholar who describes John Doe's opinion. The presence of that particular yoga pose, that particular young woman, and that particular skimpy dress all have precisely nothing to do with the category:John Doe. It is an error to connect the example chosen (it had to be just one) as any of many examples would have done as well: a red-haired woman in a green bikini doing a sitting pose would have been just as valid an example, and in neither case should the image be categorised as anything to do with John Doe.

I do hope this is clear: it isn't safe to assume that the presence of an image in a Wikipedia article, even if well-chosen, apposite, and supported by reliable evidence, is still not proof that a category is required for that image. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yoga categories on Commons

Hi, just a note to say I saw your comment, the first thing I've ever heard you say in reply to anything actually, so thank you. I do not however really think it appropriate to discuss Commons matters here on Wikipedia, they are separate Wikis. Further, you have read my comments over there. I'll just say that the matter is quite serious - harm is being done to the structure, and to be honest I wish you'd stop. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You must enter the category to discuss, and raise the changes to the entire community. Wikipedia is my only reference. --Allforrous (talk) 15:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're causing multiple discussions over two wikis; and editing on a Commons Category Talk page is tantamount to guaranteeing no reply, basically. OK, I'll not reply here again; please don't touch my talk page either on Wikipedia or on Commons, I've seen your remarks, repeatedly. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

how do i reach you Allforrous?

Hello how do i reach you Allforrous? trying the Talk page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindpim (talk • contribs) 00:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Vector (2022) conversation

Hello! As a member of WikiProject Usability, I wanted to draw your attention to a conversation currently underway on WP:VPR (see the beginning of the discussion) around adopting Vector 2022 as the new default skin.

The Web team at the Wikimedia Foundation has been working on Vector 2022 for the past three years, collaborating with the English Wikipedia community as well as other wikis to ensure that the skin performs better qualitatively and quantitatively for readers and communities than the previous Vector skin. The goal of the new skin is to create a more welcoming and easier to use experience for readers and editors across the wiki. For more details, see our new FAQ.

For the past couple of months, we have collected thoughts from the English Wikipedia community on what changes need to be made to the skin prior to it being considered ready for deployment. Our next step would be to start an RfC to assess whether the community considers Vedtor 2022 ready.

Prior to the beginning of the RfC, we wanted to draw your attention to the current conversation and encourage your feedback on the skin.

Our results from Vector 2022 at a glance

The sticky header makes it easier to access tools that editors use often. It decreases scrolling to the top of the page by 16%
The new table of contents makes it easier to navigate to different sections. Readers and editors jumped between sections 50% more than with the old table of contents
The new search bar is easier to find and makes it easier to find the correct search result from the list. This increased the amount of searches started by 30% on the wikis we tested on
The collapsible sidebar allows readers and editors to choose whether they want to see the main menu or not. Our testing shows that this allows people to better focus on their current task - reading with a collapsed menu, or editing with an open menu
The language switching menu makes it possible to switch languages without scrolling
The user menu collects all user links in a single place, making it easier to understand what each link does. In testing, 71% of surveyed editors reported positive experiences with the new menu

Thank you, OVasileva (WMF), SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons cat boxes

Hi Alforrous, there's no need to create an Ext links section just for a box. Please put it (not inline) as a box on the right in "Sources" unless the Ext links already exists, when inline is just fine. Thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commonscat

Please note that this template does not go in the see also section. It is an external link, and must go in the external links section. Use Commonscat-inline if there are not other links. Skyerise (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports organizations established in 1829

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports organizations established in 1829 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American innovators has been nominated for deletion

Category:American innovators has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Superheroes

Dear Allforrous do you like superheroes? MariaLuBeua (talk) 00:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I like them that's what I wanted to talk about. MariaLuBeua (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, I carry the categories of fictional characters. Best regards. Allforrous (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the best superhero in Marvel Comics? MariaLuBeua (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man MariaLuBeua (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could the Spider-Man character article for me. MariaLuBeua (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He's my favorite character too. What do you like the most? Allforrous (talk) 01:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you edit Spider-Man as the main protagonist of the Marvel Universe because he's clearly the highest ranking superhero in Marvel. MariaLuBeua (talk) 01:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man is my favorite too. MariaLuBeua (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He's the true hero of Marvel with great power there must come great responsibility MariaLuBeua (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't. I only deal with references like everyone else. Allforrous (talk) 01:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you edit the superhero article it's locked MariaLuBeua (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After all Spider-Man is special MariaLuBeua (talk) 01:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this is a sock of a long term vandal. Please don't engage. - MrOllie (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS award category merger?

Category:Computer science award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Computer science award winners has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shardul.chiplunkar (talk) 14:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]