User talk:ArisB

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Michaelbusch 05:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Internationalised Curriculum

An article you started, Internationalised Curriculum, has been proposed for deletion under Wikipedia's Criteria for speedy deletion G11, advertising. You can contest the proposal by typing {{hangon}} on the article and providing reasons for keeping the article on its discussion page, Talk:Internationalised Curriculum. Best, --Shirahadasha 05:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Internationalized curriculum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jonnie d smith 05:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Monolingual immersion

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Monolingual immersion, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Monolingual immersion is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Monolingual immersion, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Aldo.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Aldo.png. The copy called Image:Aldo.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 12:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Internationalised Curriculum. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Internationalised curriculum

Internationalised curriculum, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Internationalised curriculum satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internationalised curriculum and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Internationalised curriculum during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Praht Thai School. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Internationalised curriculum, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Michaelbusch 19:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Michaelbusch 20:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the curt warning but why are my edits disruptive and yours are not...you are attempting to censor valid material and that to me seems a far cry from the harter of Wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ArisB (talk • contribs)

See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Michaelbusch 20:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly disrupting the encyclopedia by removing AfD templates, in addition to rather increasingly uncivil comments on various article talk pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

In response to your email

I am not able to help you improve these articles, because I am not aware of any reliable sources that I could get information on the topic from. The vandalism that you were blocked for was the repeated removal of AfD templates; if you will look above, you were warned that you would be blocked if you removed the template again. Removing the template after that final warning was simply your request to be blocked, and I granted the request. You might find it useful to use your 48 hours to read the notability guidelines, the guidelines on reliable sources, our core policy on verifiability of information, and the civility guidelines. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your article recreations

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. Michaelbusch 18:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 18:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArisB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only added links where editors have requested them. Please explain why you decided to block me and please unblock me. I believe I am being helpful and responding to editors requirements not spamming. I don't understand.ArisB 01:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Can you please point out where these editors requested that you recreate a previously deleted page, or where they asked you to add the links? — Yamla 03:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of Franco Arabic

An article that you have been involved in editing, Franco Arabic, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Arabic. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-Aldo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Image-Aldo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]