User talk:Astredita

Welcome!

Hello, Astredita, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Retrograde and prograde motion. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Reatlas (talk) 00:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Astredita, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Astredita! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting me

I'm cleaning up the links so that User:Citation bot can properly cite the articles. Please let the bot finish. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

40 billion

FOLLOWUP - Seems astronomer Geoffrey Marcy (co-author) is quoted as follows:

Marcy says if you combine that result with this newer study looking at sun-like stars, it suggests that our Milky Way galaxy contains something like 40 billion Earth-sized planets with lukewarm temperatures. "So that's really the stunning number, I think," says Marcy.

ALSO, just now received a recent email message from astronomer Erik Petigura (co-author) as follows:

Hi, Dennis.
Great question! We found that 22±8% of G and K type stars have an 1-2x Earth-size planet in the habitable zone. Converting that into a number of planets requires multiplying by the number of stars in the Galaxy. Astronomers quote different total numbers of stars in the Milky Way. Most say 200 billion stars. But one often hears 100 billion and sometimes 400 billion. It's not well known.
About 1/4 of the stars are GK "sunlike" stars. So, adopting 200 billion stars in total, the Milky Way has about 50 billions sun-like (GK) stars. Of those, 22% have a planet 1-2X the size of Earth in their habitable zones. Thus we have 22% of 50 billion suns, coming to 11 billion Earth-size planets in the habitable zones of the sun-like stars in the Milky Way.
If you include the red dwarf stars, the vast majority, the total comes to 40 billion Goldilocks planets.
Cheers,
Erik
On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Dr. Dennis Bogdan <drbogdan@comcast.net> wrote:
Hello Erik,
I'm a Wikipedia editor currently involved with some astronomy articles - Question (if possible) => how many habitable earth-like (or "earth-sized"?) exoplanets are estimated to be orbiting sun-like stars in the Milky Way Galaxy? - seems the media has reported "40 billion" ( ref => http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/science/cosmic-census-finds-billions-of-planets-that-could-be-like-earth.html - some editors on Wikipedia think the estimated number may be different (estimates range from 8.8 billion to 100 billion) -
Thanking you in advance for your reply - Enjoy! :)
Dennis

in any case - hopefully, some of this helps in some ways - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW - a supporting citation for "11 billion" earth-sized exoplanets orbiting sun-like stars in the Milky Way Galaxy seems to be => < ref name="LATimes-20131104">Khan, Amina (November 4, 2013). "Milky Way may host billions of Earth-size planets". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 5, 2013.</ref> - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 23:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exoplanet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to NASA Exoplanet Archive may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ipac.caltech.edu/docs/exoplanet_criteria.html Exoplanet Criteria for Inclusion in the Archive], NASA Exoplanet Archive</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler

See User talk:Anthony Appleyard#kepler. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue straggler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

You've been invited to be part of WikiProject Cosmology

Hello. Your contributions to Wikipedia have been analyzed carefully and you're among the few chosen to have a first access to a new project. I hope you can contribute to it by expanding the main page and later start editing the articles in its scope. Make sure to check out the Talk page for more information! Cheers

Tetra quark (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WISE 2000+3629

The article WISE 2000+3629 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per StringTheory11's rationale on duplicate article of same subject (WISE J2000+3629). This brown dwarf is not visible to the naked eye, is not in a prominent catalog such as Messier, NGC, or Caldwell, has no coverage in independent studies and was discovered long after 1850.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 189.25.241.15 (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exoplanet

I have nominated Exoplanet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 08:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Exoplanet Pages

Template:Exoplanet Pages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:12, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]