User talk:Attipaci

This is Attipaci's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nom.tam.fits (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources in this draft represent independent coverage of the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Attipaci! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nom.tam.fits (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Entire History section is unsourced. External links should be removed from body of article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 00:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liance,

I've added a paragraph to the top of the 'History' section, describing and referencing the sources that provide the information presented there. I hope this satisfies your requirement.

I have also expanded on the list of notable applications that use the library, providing references for these also.

cheers,

-- Attila Attipaci (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I have also removed all external references from the body, and instead added them as references when appropriate (or else dropped the external links if there was a publication reference already).

cheers,

-- Attila Attipaci (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Attipaci (talk) 08:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Removed external links from body (they are now listed in the references instead, when appropriate). - Add Further references - Cleaned up references - Various corrections - Language editing and typos - Minor additions to content

AfC notification: Draft:Nom.tam.fits has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nom.tam.fits. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nom.tam.fits has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nom.tam.fits. Thanks! Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nom.tam.fits (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still has promotional issues. Additionally, for the author, claiming that other articles are like it is null as just because many articles are promotional, doesn't mean that this one should. Also, some portions have no sources supporting them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 18:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nom.tam.fits (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://nom-tam-fits.github.io/nom-tam-fits/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Nom.tam.fits may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Yes, that was my doing. I have put a slightly modified version of the proposed Wikipedia content onto the mentioned site, since the Wikipedia article was not coming online, and I thought the content should be public regardless of the Wikipedia review process. I can easily remedy this either (a) by removing the duplicated content from the github.io site, or (b) by removing the copright statement on the github.io site. Let me know if you have a preference for one over the other.

Thanks, -- Attila. Attipaci (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Either option is fine. Tavantius (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I took down the copyright from the github.io page. It now simply says 'nom.tam.fits documentation' in the footer instead. Let me know if there is anything else to be done.

-- A. Attipaci (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Tavantius. I apologize that this lands on you, since you have been fair and responsive -- and helpful. I cannot say the same of some of the other editors I have ancountered. It looks like @CactusWriter simply decided to delete the draft article, before I could respond to the copyright issue, which was no more than an unfortunate accident. I simply tried to make the draft Wikipedia article available while it was under review for 6 months, not realizing that the tool I used automatically added a copyright to it. That copyright was never intentional, and the Wikipedia article I wrote preceded its pblishing anyway. It's frustrating to spend something like 100 hours writing an article, jumping through dozens of semi-arbitrary hoops, only to have ones work discarded by an overzealous editor. I'm a scientist who is used to peer review, but I never had someone simply erase my work without having a chance to respond. I hope you can restore the article, because I spent a ridiculous amount of time crafting it to the whim of other editors, who don't really seem to care the slightest bit about the work one puts into the creation of draft articles... Given that the reason for deletion was silly, and that the copyright issue has been remedied, I really hope you can restore the article with all the references that have now been lost... Thanks in advance. -- Attila Attipaci (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't, however, you can request undeletion at WP:RFU, as long as you explain why the copyright problem is solly. Tavantius (talk) 02:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nom.tam.fits (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi @Attipaci. Thank you for your comments. It would really help if we just had one or two sources that discuss, analyse, comment on the Library. Surely there has to be something in tech magazines, books, journals? Something that covers the Library in-depth maybe discussing its features and history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]