User talk:BDD user
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).
We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
- The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.
Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
|
The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path | |
| Great work so far on your edits! JenOttawa (talk) 02:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC) |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi BDD user! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Touching base
[edit]Hi! I hope that you are well. Your edits are looking great. I will re-organize the Cochrane Update list today to include the march 1st additions in alphabetical order. The papers marked as "done" are automatically archived on the 1st of each month as well by the bot. New papers go to the bottom automatically and I adjust to make it easier to find articles. While here I also noticed you had some questions about tables. If you still are having trouble I would be happy to meet for a quick call and help. Thanks, Jenny JenOttawa (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Cochrane
[edit]Hi, BDD user. I wanted to let you know why I reverted this edit. As you can see by perusing Dementia with Lewy bodies, rivastigmine is already well covered by very recent secondary reviews. There is usually no reason to add a 2003 source to any medical article, but in particular, not to DLB which already uses the most recent secondary sources available. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Same here ... this article already uses a newer source:[1] we should be using the most recent reviews, rather than very old ones. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello again, BDD user and JenOttawa. I just reverted and replaced a similar problem in this edit to insomnia. Mention of further research needed eighteen years ago is not encyclopedic, is too dated to use, and it's important to check what has resulted from that "further research needed" before adding such old information. If the research isn't mentioned in recent secondary reviews, it's probably UNDUE to add such info. In fact, I replaced that text with a secondary review that is 14 years newer. Please keep in mind when adding Cochrane information you should always check PubMED to see if there are newer reviews available, very old reviews are rarely useful, and very old mentions of "further research needed" will require checking to see where that has landed.
A more concerning issue is at autism spectrum, where I removed and replaced outdated and inaccurate information about medication.[2] Thanks for your effort, and please take care to be sure information is still accurate before adding. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]
|
The Medicine Barnstar | |
| Thank you for all your recent improvements to medical articles via the Cochrane Wikipedia Project. It is a pleasure to work with you! |
JenOttawa (talk) 02:30, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for updating the references to Cochrane reports - keep it up! Mike Peel (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Greetings
[edit]Hello there. I saw your edit to DVT, thank you. I did spend some time making sure this Cochrane reference still verified the prose in the DVT article. In the future, can I recommend something? Instead of just saying "Update Cochrane reference" as an edit summary, how about instead saying something like "updated Cochrane reference and ensured that the prose is still verified" or the like? I hope you're verifying this already, but I just don't know if that's the case because the edit summary was vague and did not address the concept of WP:Verifiability, which is very important around here. Also, as you can see with my edit[3], I did not include the PMC number because that won't help readers verify the information until after April 2022 because of the embargo. So I would only recommend including a PMC number if the article is already released and freely accessible at that site. Thank you! Biosthmors (talk) 18:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
And as an FYI, adding a url to a PMID is unnecessary and unhelpful. Adding a PMC will make the title of the article become a hyperlink, and the general expectation is that if the title of a reference is hyperlinked here, then readers are conditioned to think the source is freely accessible. We don't want to direct readers who are expecting to see the full text of the article to see "This article has a delayed release (embargo) and will be available in PMC on April 20, 2022.", as is the current state of PMC8092568. Does this make sense? Biosthmors (talk) 18:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
What is helpful, if the article is freely accessible at the doi, is to add this parameter. I don't know if my browsers are all logged in here at my university and if that's why it's freely-accessible for me or not. Do you know if this article is freely-accessible to the general public at the doi? Adding this parameter makes the doi the hyperlink atop the article title. It's unnecessary to add |doi-access = free if an article is already freely accessible at PMC and the PMC number is filled in. Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Exotropia Article
[edit]Hey there 👋 I just noticed that the Exotropia page was edited a day ago by this user and had some questions. I am not sure how much you know about Exotropia, but I’ve had it my whole life and had two surgeries as a child but now I am 38 years old and for most of my life I’ve only had one eye straight and they alternate frequently. Was wondering if anyone knew if having surgery again could at least make them both straight again. Having this problem is VERY irritating when you have to move your head because your eyes keep switching dominance. Thanks for any reply 🙏🏼 👍😃 Colin 2600:8806:A309:B000:A1B2:C7FA:5D2F:8FD9 (talk) 20:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
Thanks for updating the outdated citation in Vaccination in India. I love these "medical topic by country" articles but they are a pain to maintain. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to health-related articles recently. This is just a reminder that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine, and you're welcome to join us. It's also a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style, and you'll definitely find some fans of Cochrane reviews there. :-D Feel free to put it on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,