Jump to content

User talk:Bergeronpp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Bergeronpp, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Grayfell (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Bergeronpp, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bergeronpp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

AFL/NFL/Super Bowl championships

[edit]

Please see discussion at Talk:National_Football_League#No,_this_is_not_the_Chiefs’_first_NFL_Championship. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

[edit]

Hello, I'm Eagles247. Your recent edit to the page Antonio Brown appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Biden

[edit]

Hey there. There will be plenty of time to update the BLPs for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris once the votes are certified or a preponderance of reliable sources report them as having won the election. Appreciate your enthusiasm, but please sit tight for a bit and see the talk page if your have questions. Best to you. QueenofBattle (talk) 15:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter

[edit]

Sorry about the trouble with the filter. There's been a problem with severe vandalism on that page, probably from compromised accounts, and you got caught up in that. If this happens again, please report the problem at WP:EF/FP. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - American politics

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Just letting you know as well that there is an additional restriction on some articles (including Joe Biden) which states that: If a change you make to this article is reverted, you may not reinstate that change unless you discuss the issue on the talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit). Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New England Patriots, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Hannah and Craig James. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bergeronpp! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Ganesha811 (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


December 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Specifically, with these edits you WP:Piped links to the city location of 5 NFL franchises in Carolina, Jacksonville, Seattle, Tampa Bay, and Tennessee.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]

Editors reverted your Carolina[6] and Tennessee[7] edits.

Your restored the Tennessee edit.[8]

I then reverted your 4 remaining edits to Jacksonville,[9] Seattle,[10] Tampa Bay,[11] and Tennessee[12] while using the WP:Edit Summary of "MOS:PLACE" which states:

Places should generally be referred to consistently by the same name as in the title of their article.


You then restored your edit to Seattle[13] which has again been reverted with the WP:Edit Summary of "per MOS:PLACE and now editor's Talk re same." UW Dawgs (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to New York City, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please read the note regarding changes in info box. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 17:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Super Bowl champions. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1945 World Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Richards.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cincinnati Reds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Foster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arizona Diamondbacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Gonzalez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago White Sox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Wilber Marshall. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Zeng8r (talk) 01:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Too many images is secondary. The primary problem is MOS:IMAGELOC. Read it. Understand the problem and respond to what I'm complaining about, not the other issue. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: (Personal attack removed) This MLS article (w/ the exception of expansion franchises like Miami, Nashville, St. Louis which have no history of significance) has the least amount of photos in comparison to other MLS club articles. Quit stalking my edits, and why aren't you removing the excess amount of images on the Houston Dynamo, LA Galaxy, and Toronto FC pages if you truly care about his petty issue?!? Bergeronpp (talk) 00:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. First, don't call anyone anywhere that again. Please strike it. I will check back here again and if it has not been removed I will report your inappropriate language to the admins.
Second, you're arguing about the wrong thing. I'm concerned about IMAGELOC and nothing else. What does IMAGELOC say about image placement?
Third, you're the one concerned about petty issues. I am concerned about proper layout of the (clearly too many) images. If you want too many images, I'm not going to start removing them, until they actually impede a reader's ability to read, but if they look terrible on the page for layout reasons (again, see IMAGELOC).
Fourth, I'm not stalking any of your edits. I have been editing MLS (and other soccer articles) for over a decade. Every single MLS, USL and other North American league articles are on my watchlist and if you make them ugly, I'll revert those edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Walter Görlitz: cringe. Bergeronpp (talk) 01:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure what that means. Would you like to explain or should I just take this to ANI? Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Bergeronpp making a base personal attack. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - TNT 😺 19:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't expect much from anyone editing here, but an apology for what you said would have just been common courtesy. Since when did we stop with that? - TNT 😺 19:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frederick Douglass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bergeronpp. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]