User talk:Bets18

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Steven Joyce has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Steven Joyce was changed by Bets18 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975793 on 2015-09-19T11:53:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Britian and New Zealand sunshine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Britian and New Zealand sunshine, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bets18, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Bets18!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. gadfium 20:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bets18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no connections to Bettifm but unfortunately iam since Schwede66 told me that i introduce poor grammar to articles like Bettifm and its similar to by old Username but also iam not a Sockmaster ublock me right now. Bets18 (talk) 02:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if I believed that you're not a sockpuppet, your edits with this account largely were unhelpful or outright vandalism, justifying a block on this account's own merits. Huon (talk) 02:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.