User talk:Bodybagger

Welcome

If you are here at my talk page, there is a chance that I have made an edit that has somehow rubbed you the wrong way.

No one is perfect, and I am far from it. So please, speak your mind. It can't hurt.--Bodybagger (talk) 05:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, "oversight"

FYI, there's a process for removing "the worst of the worst" edits, called "oversight" or "supression". See WP:RFO. I've asked for those edits by JamesSoy that we both saw as very dubious to be removed. Studerby (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too Long listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Too Long. Since you had some involvement with the Too Long redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sport Pilot Catch 22

The article Sport Pilot Catch 22 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is largely opinion. The phrase "sport pilot catch-22" is not in popular use and not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skrelk (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]