User talk:CSMention269/Archive 8

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Joshua Zarka

Thanks for reviewing the article. I fail to see how he fails to satisfy notability. There are 23 good references there. Did you look at every one of them? MaskedSinger (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@MaskedSinger, I got your message. The fact is that some of the references which gives little bio info are government websites which are often rejected for consideration (not independent/reliable). Second is that you can't establish notability on the events you draw, if you don't follow the WP:GNG guidelines. Read it. I won't say it would be rejected but you need some reliable sources to verify the events and follows WP:SIR. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with goverment websites. I asked the question on the reliable sources noticeboard and was told they are fine as WP:SELFSOURCE. The answer was Everything is in general reliable regarding itself, beyond unduly self-serving or otherwise questionable claims. I know WP:GNG well - I don't know on which grounds you don't believe this satisfies it. MaskedSinger (talk) 05:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

@MaskedSinger, fine if you added more info from govt sources as it might act as secondary sources, but I saw that few good sources (Guardian, Times of Israel, i24) have passed mentions about him on the issue regarding his appointment, nuclear deal analysis only. Not much info was found and that won't work.

Try finding at least 2 references (news article or good citation) about better info which passes WP:GNG, then it may pass. If you wish to challenge the decision, you may re-submit. An Israeli AFC reviewer may check and decide about it since they know local information. If the problem persists, you can contact me. Good day. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 06:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Yadav (Bihar politician) has been accepted

Sanjay Yadav (Bihar politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GrabUp - Talk 07:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of C. Perumal Ex MP

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on C. Perumal Ex MP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, CSMention269. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

@Liz ma'am, there must be some misunderstanding. The page which was tagged for speedily deletion was not created by me. I just know that I review a draft version of the topic. I decline the draft and made comments on improvement. Then I changed the name "Draft:Shri C. Perumal" to Draft:C. Perumal as Shri is not applicable. Maybe the re-direct was created due to which someone paste the draft content to the mainspace of the re-direct, which I forgot to tag for deletion. Then they re-named it to bypass AFC checking. I also asked a similar question in the post Help on AFCH above for help, but no response took place. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 09:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Tagging @Justlettersandnumbers for this regard. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 09:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that looks right to me, Liz, as far as I can see CSMention269 just moved a page. (I've blocked Perumal.C Ex-Mp as a sockpuppet, BTW). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debangshu Bhattacharya (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debangshu Bhattacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, CSMention269! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Help on AFCH

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I am an AFC reviewer. I need help on how can I move the draft Draft:French court to mainspace, when the mainspace is a re-direct page to Royal court? ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 05:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

I've deleted French court, so you can now move the draft. :-) Katie^talk 21:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debangshu Bhattacharya (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dcotos was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debangshu Bhattacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dcotos (talk) 18:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)