User talk:Calcuttan

Welcome

Hello, Calcuttan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Talkback

Hello, Calcuttan. You have new messages at Salvio giuliano's talk page.
Message added 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

$Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ruderow. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will be filing a report using the redlinked page above later today when I am able to use my laptop rather than my mobile phone. - Sitush (talk) 12:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I am an independent editor altogether. If I revert your reverts in order to boost another's editor's morale, simply because I believe he is trying to improve the quality of the article, does not mean I am the same individual. Please don't assume so easily. And, I would like to request you to please contribute positively, instead of hanging on to an outdated version. Lets make the article better and more acceptable together. Calcuttan (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We do not change articles to boost someone's morale. Please self-revert and - if you really are not socking - contribute to the discussion on the talk page, where a thread has recently been opened. - Sitush (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ruderow (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Calcuttan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please note that I am an independent editor, and my contribution on Kulin Kayastha Talk Page (Section 3. Stating the facts) dated 10th March 2012 regarding disputes is posted much before user Ruderow started contributing. In this case I had reverted to last version by Ruderow, simply because I believe he is trying to improve the quality of the article. And, I would like to edit/contribute to this article independently as well. I would like to request all editors to please contribute positively, instead of hanging on to an outdated version and indulging in tactical vandalism under the garb of policies. Lets make the article better and more acceptable together. You may agree or disagree with me, but definitely, I am not a sockpuppet for Ruderow. Kindly remove this ban. Calcuttan (talk) 17:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's incredibly obvious who you are; if you want an unblock, go request it on Ruderow. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Calcuttan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my last request to unblock this user. I have contributed twice in the Kulin Kayastha Talk Page, including the one titled 'Resolution of Dispute through Discussions - Kind Attention Administrators', and any lay man can make out from my distinctive writing style who I am. Still, if this is the level of understanding of the respectable administrators of a platform like Wikipedia, I will leave it at that. Regards. Calcuttan (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. T. Canens (talk) 04:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eh? Ruderow created the Kulin Kayastha article in October 2011. - Sitush (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware. Anyways, you can well understand that I am not a proxy for Ruderow. We may disagree on any issue, blocking a user is not the way to sort it out. Calcuttan (talk) 04:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]