User talk:Canyoutietheminabow

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 15:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your first three edits were vandalism - one more and you're blocked.[edit]

But you probably know that. Doug Weller talk 15:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Doug Weller. Sorry about the trolling. Om a more serious note, how do we stop the questionable labelling of some far right figures? All of these labels can be found by references, but they are just using them to marginalise these groups. The gagging order in the UK (my home country) of the grooming trial and Robinson's susbsequent arrest is a staggering breach of freedom of speech which would not be tolerated in the US. If I was to start throwing around authoritarian labels it would be for the court who imposed the order.

Breitbart is not far right either, just right wing. I not recall them calling for any gassing, extermination, sterlising or even discrimination based on their race on their religion, just people's actions. Additionally, InfoWars publishes fake news, but generalising them as 'a fake news website' is an unencyclopedic generalisation. What would you recommend to ensure neutrality? P.S I do not agree with many of the views of the subjects above, I just think the way they are being portrayed as is biased. Canyoutietheminabow (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]