User talk:Celebdiary

Thanks for experimenting with the page Transformers (film) on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 03:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ebay & Green Day

Hi. I'll tell you the same as I told Bri1039; I notice that you almost exclusively either promote domain name sales on eBay or promote a Green Day fan web site. Please stop using Wikipedia as a way of advertising your internet endeavours. I'd also like to have a look at Wikipedia policy regarding sockpuppets. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GreenDay.net is the OFFICIAL fan site, endorsed by the band and the band frequently posts news DIRECTLY to the site. why do you keep removing it?

I didn't. I actually have no problem with that external link on the Green Day article. However, you and Bri1039 have done yourselves no favours by constantly adding material that don't just cite GreenDay.net, but directly refer to it. That certainly makes it appear that you are promoting the website, against Wikipedia policy. Your additions of eBay domain name auctions, on the other hand, are blatant adverts that fool no-one. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to EBay. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Heath Ledger‎, you will be blocked from editing. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Nakon 23:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

W

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Heath Ledger has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 21:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coming off your block

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. You're coming off a block. Once more with the spam, and you'll be blocked for much longer. ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for spamming external links. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Bri1039 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]