Jump to content

User talk:Cherylynbarnes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Charbel Habchi, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Cherylynbarnes, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish for me to stop redirecting the article, I will happily delete it instead; the article easily qualifies for speedy deletion if it does not remain a redirect. Nyttend (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Once again: the article easily qualifies for deletion, and the only alternative is deletion. Nyttend (talk) 22:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Charbel Habchi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. clpo13(talk) 05:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cherylynbarnes, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Cherylynbarnes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Naypta (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aboufawwaz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]