User talk:Choosem

Grhdjdjddjfjfkfkffjfjjtjtjr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.5.196.46 (talk) 10:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Choosem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sarileru Neekevvaru. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ab207 (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jomontgeorge, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 14:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Itcouldbepossible:What to do in this situation? Choosem (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, you can try proving that you are not a sockpuppet of the said user using your own justification. Based on your judgement a clerk might decline the CU request as well, but only if the clerk is satisfied with your answer. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 16:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Itcouldbepossible: Don't know to prove I'm not sockpuppet of the said user. Please help me. Choosem (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may start by explaining how you knew the minutest of policy details like WP:INDISCRIMINATE in your very first edit. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: I'm not an experienced Wikipedia editor. That's why I don't know to start by explaining how you knew the minutest of policy details like WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I'm not related with Pooja Hegde. Somebody saying I'm sockpuppet. Please help me. -- Choosem (talk) 00:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]