User talk:ChrisWright1979

Hello, my name is Chris, AKA user:cjwright79. That account seems to be blocked, so I created this one. I don't think I'll be doing any more trolling any time soon.

I enjoy computer role-playing games quite a lot, most recently EverQuest. But, as I quit that back in 2002, I'm now looking forward to Vanguard:Saga of Heroes. I'm a regular on that game's discussion forums. :)

Also, I have made significant contributions to the WikiPages of other great RPGs, such as Betrayal at Krondor, Ultima VII, and Drakkhen. I added the third paragraph of the EQ article too, regarding it's spoof name 'EverCrack'.

Probably the best page on Wikipedia that I have created would be Velk's lab. Just added two new companion articles on East Commonlands and Old Sebilis.

ChrisWright1979 16:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for un-autoban

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

ChrisWright1979 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.70.200.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

sock of banned user

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You were blocked directly, and not autoblocked. As stated when you added this template to your talk page (see here), you are using the wrong template and therefore your case for unblock will not be reviewed fully since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock|your reason here}} instead. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 21:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- The rules for unblocking are rather confusing to me, so I'm not entirely sure that it's legal for me to request another unblock -- I will no doubt have this page protected if I have erred. Sorry if I did, ChrisWright1979

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChrisWright1979 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will do better now; I have cleared my head and will be able to contribute to Wikipedia with a higher signal-to-noise ratio, i.e. more useful and insightful contributions, and less trolling, hopefully none whatsoever, so help me God. ChrisWright1979

Decline reason:

See ANI discussion ( [1] ). -- -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 02:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Screenshot:

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Someone for the following reason: (see our blocking policy):

Being cool..

Your IP address is x.x.x.x.

"Sock puppetry" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sock puppetry. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 11#Sock puppetry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]