Jump to content

User talk:Construction-Documentation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Problems with upload of File:Multivisa Logo Hexagon.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Multivisa Logo Hexagon.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multivista (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
QuantumRealm (meowpawtrack) 20:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Construction-Documentation! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QuantumRealm (meowpawtrack) 20:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multivista (December 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lewcm Talk to me! 08:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multivista (February 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Construction-Documentation. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Multivista, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Construction-Documentation. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Construction-Documentation|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DoubleGrazing,
I hope that all is well.
I am actually not a paid advocate, I am just trying to research and write about the construction space.
I am particularly interested in Hexagon AB companies: Hexagon AB.
I am happy to make edits to the page: can you please provide specific suggestions/feedback?
Thank you. Construction-Documentation (talk) 22:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multivista (July 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multivista (August 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multivista (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]