User talk:Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown

Welcome!

Hi Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown! I noticed your contributions to The People of Family and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Ifnord (talk) 18:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dr Salvus 20:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Undoing vandalism

When you'll be a autoconfirmed user (wait other two days and made other four edits), you'll be able to use Twinkle. Use it to undo vandalism and add warning templates. When an user vandalizes, you've got to undo it and use the Twinkle's rollback vandalism button. See Wikipedia:Twinkle. Please don't remove/change other users' comments in the talk pages Dr Salvus 21:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @ST47:, I would like to discuss my recent editing block. I am not exactly sure what I have done, and I am truly convinced I have done absolutely nothing wrong. The only thing that I believe was even slightly wrong was putting "I kid you not" in the "What you edited" box after editing a page. Perhaps, it might have been me editing many pages in a short time window. Either way, I have noticed another user who lives in the same area as mine has gotten this block too. I am perplexed as to what might have happened, and I am looking for a clear answer. Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm the person who had this kind of block. I'm his friend. He had a message who says: You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting this IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. I had also this problem (the blocking administrator was you too) with the same expiration date. Before receiving this message I had an email who said someone had requested a change of the password of the account. Hope this helps. Dr Salvus 22:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Le tre bandiere moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Le tre bandiere, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, the article does sound informal at times, so that's something that could be fixed. Those remarks didn't come from any sources, so I do get that point now. I took out those ones, and added two citations. I guess it should sound more formal now? However, the citations are poor, since there are barely any sources on that subject. For example, all I can find online about the alternate version is music videos on Youtube, but I don't know if that's allowed. It sounds silly, so I'd assume it isn't. Either way the second citation is what it is, and the article is still a draft Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 22:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Le tre bandiere (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Le tre bandiere may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky Copyrighted content? All the content in that article was written by me, even the lyrics. Is it the lyrics? But there's no way this one gets deleted but many other songs don't. Beyond that I have no idea what is violating the rules. Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 07:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky the lyrics were typed out manually, that's what I mean. I could have copied the lyrics I found online but they have some typos and grammatical mistakes (why wouldn't I just fix those then?) ~~ Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's the nature of copyright on creative works. Even if you transcribed from the song itself, the lyrics is still the work of the the songwriter. – robertsky (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Le tre bandiere taken down?

@Primefac: Sorry to bother you, I was wondering what got my article taken down. From what I can tell it's a copyright issue, but what exactly even violates that? I have no clue. Thanks for your attention either way. Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 09:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying text directly from another source is a copyright violation, and the reason why your page was deleted. You are welcome to write an article about the song (i.e. the history, significance of the lyrics, etc), but it should not contain the entirety of the text quoted verbatim. Primefac (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: So, are you saying the article would be let in even if it didn't have a lyrics section? But wouldn't it become a stub otherwise? Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 18:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there's enough detail and good references, sure. Primefac (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Then, to be fair, trying to revive let alone care about this article seems stupid since there are no sources on the internet other than lyrics sites and music videos. I don't really think I'd be able to add that much content there that aren't my own personal thoughts on the song (say, what x and y means) Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it sounds like there isn't really enough to write an article about the matter. Primefac (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]