User talk:Cwootten13

May 2024

Your edit to Draft:Verse has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The material is cited what do you mean?? CruzWootten (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You copied the material from a website. The fact that you cite the website doesn't excuse the copyright violation.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically used a quote block and wrote 'As Stated by' referencing the author? Your farming on this one please undo your actions Cwootten13 (talk) 20:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At least move it back to drafts so I can change it, you deleted it entirely which is rude Cwootten13 (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cwootten13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got blocked for having two accounts, even though I was not in anyway using them illegitimately. This was a personal attack by admin Bbb23, who deleted the article I submitted and when I called him/or her out and requested the article be moved back to draft status so I could correct their frivolous claim, they blocked my account. One look at this admin's talk page shows that they have several problems with other users as well. I did nothing wrong and was simply trying to contribute to the Wikipedia project (big fan :)) Cwootten13 (talk) 20:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You used one account to comment on the talk page of the other, this makes it seem like you are multiple people. If you lose track of which account you are using, you should stick to a single account. No personal attacks are involved here; Bbb23 acted to remove a clear copyright violation. Yes, admins usually have problems with other users, comes with the territory and tools the community has given us. I see no grounds here at this time to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not e-mail me again.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cwootten13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

how does something 'seeming' to be constitute an indefinite ban?! Not only did I speak using the same tense in both accounts, but also both accounts have the same word in it!! It's one thing if my intentions were bad, but anyone can tell easily that I had no bad intentions! Not to mention look at the age my account!!! Why wasnt I given a warning first?! Everything in the blocking policy says to cut new people a little slack! I dont want mess Wikipedia up, I want to contribute to it! All of this is really justification for an indefinite ban and I can never contribute to the wikipedia project now?? This is absolutely rediculous. Please reconsider this indefinite ban, this is absolutley unfair and if this request is denied then what exactly are my options to get back into good standing? Cwootten13 (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This block is clearly a mistake. There was no abusive use of the two accounts, and I don't see how anyone who has seen your edits could possibly think that they made it "seem like you are multiple people"; it was clearly one person, with no attempt to pretend otherwise. JBW (talk) 21:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VerseProgrammingLanguageIcon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VerseProgrammingLanguageIcon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unreal Editor for Fortnite (software) (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unreal Editor for Fortnite (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cwootten13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your insight, I would rather do it the correct way so I will get on top of it and make sure everything is in order before resubmitting! Cwootten13 (talk) 22:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]