User talk:Damidez12

April 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Elassint ^Hi 22:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tiwa Savage, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 23:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abot the report

Good day,

Am just trying to add latest News about Tiwasavage to the reference, but i Don't know it violate the rules am so Sorry.

Thank you Damidez12 (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

Wikipedia is not a social network. All articles need to be encyclopedic in nature. You can check the requirements for notability here and additionally how to reference sources to prove notability here

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Damidez12/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Damidez12/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 02:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Damidez12! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Discuss 02:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Davido, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damidez12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Day

I Read the Reasons Why you Blocked me, I see it because You See that am Advertising or Promoting.

Am only Trying to add new thing about the article e.g in My last Edit Davido article, the singer was Announced New Endorsement Deal with Infinix Mobile and i think ut supposed to be added that why i Add it to the Endorsement Category and put the Source.

Pls am using this opportunity to Apologize, i Edit the way i understand it , I Won't Do Such again.if You Can Unblock the acct

Pls Unblocked Me

Thank YouDamidez12 (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since the only thing you've done on Wikipedia is add links to a now-suspended domain, I don't see any value to unblocking you. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damidez12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Day Is not that am Only adding links,The article i want to write am stil Gettin All the Informations i need to add to the article Have already write one article before that was not approve, am stil Working on how to rewrite it also Am looking for the progress of Wikipedia Thank you Damidez12 (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damidez12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Day Am stil appealing for the Unblocked. I think the Block is not necessary Again because have understand and Realised what have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, to Wikipedia again and i we abide with the Rules and make useful contributions instead. I we Always look for The Progress ,i Won't cause any damages again. If you Unblocked me Thank you Damidez12 (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not clear that you understand why you were blocked, and per WP:CIR, we require basic competency in written English grammar and punctuation/capitalization rules. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've done nothing but add links to "proudlyloaded", a domain that you own. You may not do that. What will you do instead? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Damidez12/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Damidez12/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]