Jump to content

User talk:Daniel0wellby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has an alternative account named Daniel0Wellby_sch.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Daniel0Wellby sch)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Daniel0wellby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem in this wiki page who i created (Rawat Mahila B.Ed. College)

[edit]

Hello Daniel, Please help what is the problem in this page. why it will be deleted in few days. what changes could be. please help us how to change it & what changes. and also please help us how to categorized a wiki page.

edits

[edit]

what exactly was an "unconstructive edit"? My restoring an unwarranted unreasonable removal of sourced and sky-blue information, that the other editor kept doing? Please don't put impertinent meat-puppet junk on my talk page. This editor, MrX, is clearly violating Wikipedia policy against "I don't like" by suppressing copiously sourced and well-known and well-established (and sky-blue) information. With edit-warring, and also harassing my Talk page. Also, I never said "ISIL" anywhere, so that's a lie or sloppy misrepresentation...but simply restored his removal of the "Islamic terrorism in Europe" link in the info box. 71.246.96.210 (talk) 17:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel, now you're actually editing and tampering with my own edits and comments on article talk pages? Do you even know that you have zero right to do that? Daniel, you're being reported now for your nonstop violations, disrespect, and insanity. 71.246.96.210 (talk) 17:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance tasks

[edit]

Hi. Maintenance tasks, especially patrolling new pages, are not for beginners. Please concentrate on adding new content and/or sources to articles and refrain from other maintenance or deletion systems until you have significantly more experience and understand our policies and guidelines. When you have reached 200 mainspace edits you will qualify to enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn all about vandalism and what you can do to help combat it. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Daniel0wellby! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:58, Monday, June 19, 2017 (UTC)

Are you serious? Read my edits, then apologise. I cited 5 different articles, you removed my contribution because 'insert copy-pasted reason beep-boop'. Did you even read the edits? Because i am sure as hell i just spent 10 minutes citing sources only for some moron to remove them. --194.67.216.222 (talk) 09:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

[edit]

Daniel0wellby, I have spoken to you before about acting like a 'moderator' with only 31 edits to your name. If any blocks are being lined up, be sure you are not in the firing line. I suggest you adopt a more collegial spirit if you want to enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- Understood he/she was getting on my nerves him reverting his poorer edit and removal of information.Daniel0Wellby sch (talk) 10:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We'll let someone else sort that out, but remember, 'you' are a very raw noob, and although the Wikipedia is the encyclopedia any one can edit, because it's an encyclopedia, we expect our users to act like grown ups and not like school children. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm terribly sorry, but as a member of Krivošije clan, Samardžić brotherhood, I can see that I'm speaking one language called Serbo-Croatian language, and that Montenegrian is just one of dialects of aforementioned language, so please put correct information back on the page. God bless you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.254.152.202 (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Daniel. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villum Foundation is your second AFD ever; can I suggest that you lurk around at AFD and participate in a whole lot of of discussions before you nominate any articles again? If my own notes on notability and how to act and what to do at and not to do at AFD can prove inspirational, I would be happy, and you are very welcome to consult with me on my talk page if you need any kind of guidance. Please do not toss accusations of socking around as you did at AFD, there is no indication of that, and since the MaKor account has not been in use for 8+ years, an WP:SPI would be futile. Sam Sailor 13:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ulmus minor Hunnybunii (Varieties).

[edit]

Hello, Daniel. I gave an explanation for moving these sentences and pictures to a different page. The content is not strictly relevant to this page (pseudo-Stricta is a different clone); it is now on its own page, Ulmus minor Hunnybunii pseudo-Stricta, with a link directing the reader there. I wrote both pages, and sent them to a registered editor to save. Nothing has been lost. Rather than duplicating material, Wiki generally uses links to the subject-specific page. Regards, 193.39.159.73 (one of). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.159.73 (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aaahhh!

[edit]

So this is how you leave a message for someone. Cayley massif temperature gradients. You, my friend, don't know the difference between mK (millikelvin, or 1/1000 th) and MK megakelvin, millions. Factor of a trillion. Pretty uninformed and subrate, considering you incorrectly tried to corrected me when I corrected it. Even the original reference said milliKelvin and you did not bother to read it, and then still upbraided me for not referencing things. And then someone in the know corrected you. I did not even need to see the reference to know MegaKelvin/meter was ridiculous, that implies the mountain is thousands of times hotter than the surface of the sun, let alone the solar core. You did not know what you were talking about and slagged off on those that did. If you are scientifically illiterate, you should not dabble in science. And, there are about 4 people on your talk page that say you really should not be doing the things on Wikipedia that you are. And this 5th thing was really, really out to lunch scientifically. Your actions speak for themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.125.246.81 (talk) 08:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]