User talk:Danrolo~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Danrolo~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Baristarim 19:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Jimmy.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimmy.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Party of Modernity and Democracy for Syria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Party of Modernity and Democracy for Syria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Some tips to help you out (and to avoid making mistakes!)

Hi Danrolo~enwiki, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Danrolo~enwiki/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

How references work

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Danrolo~enwiki/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!

Hi there Danrolo~enwiki! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Verifiability - Sources - Original research - BRD

Hello Danrolo,

as Wikipedia:Verifiability is a main principle of Wikipedia, it is important to verify all your edits with Wikipedia:Reliable sources. If you do not, it is very likely that your additions create the impression of being Wikipedia:Original research and will be contested or reverted. Providing sources is especially important if you make contentious claims, such as political parties being far right or neo-fascist Thank you for your co-operation. Regards --RJFF (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Reverts

Hello Danrolo,

If one of your edits gets reverted, please do not re-revert it, as you did here and here. Instead, open a discussion on the Wikipedia:Talk page, according to the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Otherwise, your behaviour may be perceived as Wikipedia:Edit warring. Thank you --RJFF (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing sourced content

Hello again,

also derived from verifiability is the guideline not to simply remove information that refers to reliable sources, as you did here. If you have doubts about the reliability or correctness of the source or the relevance of the content, please discuss this on the respective talk page. But simply removing sourced content will not be accepted. Moreover, please start using the edit summary box below the editing field, to explain your edits. Many other Wikipedians will be grateful. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 18:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Ba'athism

What in gods fuckings name is wrong with you?! Do you even know what ba'athism is?? Apparently you don't because you seem to be readding and readding the other ideologies all the FUCKIGN time. Either start using you're head, and learn about the topic, or fuck off. --TIAYN (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm gonna block you're ass

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war on ba'athist related articles. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I have left an extended explanation at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Stargate#Re-organization_of_the_main_char._list and hope your disengage from editing this list for the time being.

I may be blocked to, but I couldn't give a shit... At least I don't add reduntat f***ings information, and at least I know what ba'athism when I edit ba'athist related articles. Do you know what ba'athism is? pretty sure you don't know! --TIAYN (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Do you know what the key difference between Ba'ath Party (Damascus) and Ba'ath Party (Syria) is? --TIAYN (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey Danrolo, of course you may delete those vulgar attacks above. --RJFF (talk) 14:09, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Sources, edit summary

By the way, it is really important that you start providing sources to verify your contributions. It is quite tiring to check and revert all your arbitrary, original research edits, merely based on your private perceptions and knowledge. Please accept that these are not to be included on Wikipedia. WP:Verifiability is the key! And please, please, please do consider using the edit summary field to explain your edits to other users. The community will be really thankful. Regards --RJFF (talk) 14:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey Danrolo,

I urge you to please rethink your arbitrary edits and warm toward verifiability and reliable sources. Please provide sources for your changes and explain your changes in edit summaries. You know that I cannot force you to do so, but your method is very unccoperative. You make it impossible to work together with you and provoke tiredness and annoyance about your edits among other users. And all of your edits can get reverted unless you base them on sources. Please change this. --RJFF (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Unsourced material (Original research)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Justice and Development Party (Morocco). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --RJFF (talk) 22:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for providing an edit summary, though. I think that you are able to learn. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 22:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please do start using edit summaries. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Wrong

The Iraqi-led Ba'ath Party was established following the split in the Ba'ath Party in 1966. The Ba'athist cell, which is covered in Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region, was founded in 1951. These are two different organisations. When Saddam was General Secretary of the Regional Command, he was General Secretary of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region, not the Iraqi-led Ba'ath Party. Saddam did not head the Iraqi-led Ba'ath Party until 1989, when Michel Aflaq died... --TIAYN (talk) 13:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In 17 July Revolution, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page A.M. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Kataeb and Arabic MOS

I reverted your edits on Kataeb bcs per MoS Arabic dashes should be placed between the "al" or "el" and the following word i.e. "al-Din" or "el-Sheikh". They should also be lower-cased unless they're the first word in a sentence. Eli+ 07:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

UDI

Hi, I think UDI is right-wing and also center-right, as stated in the Spanish version. I'd appreciate if you could undo your last edition to Unión Demócrata Independiente. Thnak you.--Flarenas (talk) 07:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Luciana Salazar, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Original research

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Convergence and Union, you may be blocked from editing. --RJFF (talk) 22:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Arab Socialist Union (Syria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arab Socialist Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Verifiability

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to National Party of Honduras and Liberal Party of Honduras. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --RJFF (talk) 13:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Danrolo,

I have told you a zillion times to please use the edit summary to summarize and explain your edits. Do it please! --RJFF (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Democratic Arab Socialist Union

The article Democratic Arab Socialist Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Phearson (talk) 03:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to National Salvation Front in Syria. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do use edit summaries to summarize and explain your edits to other users. It is essential for constructive co-operation in this project. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 23:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kurdistan Democratic Party of Syria. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --RJFF (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Patriot(ic) Party

Hello Danrolo,

I have moved the article back to the old title. Both translations of "Partido Patriota" are possible and equally correct, but most sources (both books and news) seem to use "Patriotic Party". Therefore this variant is preferrable for Wikipedia. If you want to move an article and the move is likely to be controversial, please decide to go the way of Wikipedia:Requested moves to find consensus for the move in the future. Co-operation and communication are essential for a great project like Wikipedia. Kind regards. Thank you for the sweets, by the way. --RJFF (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Final Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Democratic Appeal, Democratic Movement (France), Arise the Republic, Europe Écologie–The Greens, Citizen and Republican Movement, Radical Party of the Left, Union for a Popular Movement you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --RJFF (talk) 23:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

It's not up to me to decide but to the administrators. If you don't change your behaviour and your editing practice, I think it would be best to block you. Why don't you follow the advise and the requests and the warnings of other users? Why don't you even try to comply with Wikipedia's rules and guidelines? If you need help, if you don't know how to comply to the rules and to contribute in a constructive way, there are plenty of ways: it's all explained at Wikipedia:Help and at Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. If you don't understand it, you could ask other users, you could ask me. Everyone will be ready and glad to explain it to you and to help you. But you haven't shown that you're interested in learning how to edit constructively. You have shown that you're only interested in doing your own thing, working against other users and against policies and rules. I would be really relieved and pleased if you would try to change, but I struggle to believe you will. --RJFF (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

And what's this??? You don't want to blocked, but you do exactly, what you know that will lead to your block. Adding unverified and plain wrong stuff. That's utterly disruptive. You must stop it. If you don't, you must be blocked. --RJFF (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You've recently passed the 1,000 edit mark, congrats! Thanks for continuing to expand articles, especially on Middle East politics. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

{{Chilean elections}}

Hello Danrolo. I was wondering why you removed the 2011 referendum from this template? According the this source there was a four-part referendum in 2011, albeit an unofficial one, in which almost 1.5 million people voted. Number 57 23:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Colombian elections

What was the source for the dates of presidential election?--Antemister (talk) 08:19, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring again

Your recent editing history at Civic Solidarity Union shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring again, multiple articles

Your recent editing history at National Renewal (Chile), Free Patriotic Union and Popular Petition shows that you are currently engaged in multiple edit wars. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 12:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Syrian elections

Do you have a source for an election in Syria in 1957? I cannot find one, and it wasn't listed in the Nohlen book. Cheers, Number 57 08:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, I've found that there were by-elections this year, but it's not the same as a full election. Number 57 21:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adriana Barrientos

The article Adriana Barrientos has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:32, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicole "Luli" Moreno

The article Nicole "Luli" Moreno has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:02, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roxana Muñoz

The article Roxana Muñoz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Nicole "Luli" Moreno. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 18:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicole "Luli" Moreno

The article Nicole "Luli" Moreno has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, as you did at Nicole "Luli" Moreno, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 20:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Ba'ath Party (Syrian-dominated faction)

We've been over this, the Ba'ath Party (Syrian-dominated faction) is not a Syrian party, its a pan-Arab party.. For the party which governs Syria see Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region... The Syrian-dominated Ba'ath Party has branches in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Sudan and so on.. Are you calling the Egyptians Syrian??? Are Yemeni people Syrian?? Are Iraqi Syrian??? No. The party is Arabic, not Syrian... So you stop vandalising the page, okay? --TIAYN (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pamela Díaz, Danrolo!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

reviewed now

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Reform party of Syria

You are re-adding unverified and unsourced text. I don't understand why you are insisting upon doing this. بروليتاريا (talk) 14:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

You aren't an admin... I am going to report this to an actual admin if you continue to violate basic wikipedia polices. بروليتاريا (talk) 20:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reform Party of Syria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lobby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Syrian civil war, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeancey (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Cold War

Hi Danrolo, I see you've restored North Yemen Civil War to the Cold War template. I removed it because I couldn't see any connection between the two, other than the accident that they happened during the 1960s. Do you have evidence for the connection? If not, let's remove it once and for all. Thanks Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Maarrat al-Nu'man move

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Maarrat al-Nu'man. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Danrolo, please don't capitalise the definite article (al-) per the Arabic manual of style on Wikipedia Yazan (talk) 00:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced information in National Renewal (Chile)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to National Renewal (Chile), without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at National Renewal (Chile) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Deliberate factual errors

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at International Democrat Union, you may be blocked from editing. --RJFF (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

National Renewal (Chile)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at National Renewal (Chile), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --RJFF (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced information

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Democratic Party of Japan and Liberal Democratic Party (Japan). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --RJFF (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 17:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Danrolo. User:RJFF has listed a number of problems with your account at a variety of articles. If you don't respond to these complaints, people may assume that you have no defence, and it is possible you may be blocked for disruption. It would be in your interest to respond and tell your side of the story. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit-waarring across multiple articles, probable sock puppetry, and distruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

• I've extended your block so it expires one week from today. This is for your block evasion on three articles.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

• I've now indeffed this account due to persistent sock puppetry across multiple articles.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Danrolo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Danrolo~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)