User talk:DanteValentinov
November 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm CosmLearner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kubrat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. C⚛smLearner 💬🔬 13:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kubrat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fuzheado | Talk 14:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not vandalism, I'm the fixing the mistakes,studies show his real name was Krovat.And there's some other things to fix but I don't have that energy. DanteValentinov (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please read WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:CITE. PhilKnight (talk) 17:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.