Jump to content

User talk:Devetakapija

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, Devetakapija, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!
I will ask you questions if I have any.
Kind regards,
Dusan Devetakapija (talk) 11:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (April 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. - RichT|C|E-Mail 12:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Rich,
Please see that all above noted content is now is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Please browse to the bottom of the following pages to see the licence:
https://ljubisabojic.com/
https://ljubisabojic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Ljubisa-Bojic-2022.pdf
Could you please indicate which exact segments you think should be changed. I tried to write my own (original) text, not to take from pages that were linked to. Also, the photo is marked by the above noted licence.
Kind Regards,
Dusan Devetakapija (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Devetakapija! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 12:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (April 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (June 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HenryTemplo (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (July 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ljubisa Bojic

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Devetakapija. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ljubisa Bojic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ljubisa Bojic

[edit]

Hello, Devetakapija. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ljubisa Bojic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ljubisa Bojic moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ljubisa Bojic, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 14:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (June 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (October 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (December 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is constantly present in the media throughout South-Eastern Europe to comment on the social impact of AI as a scientist who does research. This can be seen through the new links that have been added. The subject scientific paper published in one of the top future studies journals has been accessed 15K times, as it offers novel ideas and analysis of highly important topics related to AI and the metaverse: https://eujournalfuturesresearch.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40309-022-00208-4
Also, the subject had been appointed by the chief scientist of UNEP to the foresight panel preparing recommendations for the next General Assembly of the United Nations: https://www.unep.org/ocs/foresight-expert-panel
The subject has published a book, many scientific papers, and has been interviewed many times by mainstream media. According to this, I think the subject is not sufficiently notable. I think the decision should be reconsidered and that this page should be published. Devetakapija (talk) 10:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to this, I cannot see how the subject is not sufficiently notable. On the contrary, I think it is. Devetakapija (talk) 10:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]