User talk:DunsonDavis

Welcome!

Hello, DunsonDavis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Neerali. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 11:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neerali

Regarding this edit - The reason why the genre is not added is that there is a conflict in the genre. The director says it's a "drama-thriller", at the same time Mohanlal has described it as an "action adventure" [1][2], and there are other sources which states the genre as "road movie" [3] and "action thriller" [4][5]. So do not add the genre until it has been confirmed. Regarding the addition of more sources, it is unnecessary since the lead is a summary of the body. All statements are sourced in the body, so no need to cite it in the lead too. It's citation overkill. Besides, this ref you added says the wrong release date. Cast: Who said that the cast can be arranged in the order they were hired in the movie ? That's absurd.--Let There Be Sunshine 15:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 1: Mohanlal wasn't talking about the genre Reference 2: no quotes from any source related to the movie Reference 3: The article says action thriller and no quotes from any source related to the movie Reference 4: The article says action thriller and no quotes from any source related to the movie

My reference explicitly quotes the movie's director claiming it to be a Drama Thriller

I had already added that director's description of the film in the Production section, even before you found that link. The above mentioned sources are only two or three of the multitude of sources describing it with other genres. All are from reputed news agencies. If there is a conflict, it's always good to wait for an additional confirmation (from the makers itself). That is why I did not add that genre in the lead. You still haven't answered about the cast ordering I asked you.--Let There Be Sunshine 16:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And regarding this edit - No matter how many sources says the release date as June 14. It's out-of-date as the film's release date has been officially changed to June 15. You are adding erroneous data to the article.--Let There Be Sunshine 16:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a reference. Or lets remove th release date until its confirmed. Lets wait for the release and update later.

Lol. There is already reference in the Release section with old and postponed (current) release dates. June 15 is officially confirmed, just search the posts at producer Santhosh T. Kuruvilla's Facebook page or of other crew members [6]. What about the question I asked about the cast order ? It's me who is replying and providing references all the time, while you skip questions here and at the page talk.--Let There Be Sunshine 18:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Your recent editing history at Neerali shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
DunsonDavis, you need to STOP reverting and having others do reverts for you and discuss this on the talk page until there is consensus. You are edit-warring over this which does not work with Wikipedia's collaborative environment. If you continue reverting, you will be reported to the edit-war noticeboard and probably blocked from editing. You MUST discuss this, especially with multiple editors disagreeing with you. You cannot simply force your preferred version into the article. Ravensfire (talk) 16:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]