User talk:Edvis3692

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Elina Born. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2016, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 12:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Eurovision Song Contest 2016. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Lithuania will probably have a pretty good chance at next year's Eurovision, but please don't fill in the winner until the contest is over!! :) – Hshook (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of countries in the Eurovision Song Contest, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 07:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2015, you may be blocked from editing. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 16:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

China at Eurovision

Why do you keep adding China as making a debut at Eurovision Song Contest 2016, when there are no sources to confirm this information? What you are doing is disruptive and can lead to blocking sanctions if it continues. Wes Mouse ✒ 13:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2016, you may be blocked from editing. Rubbish computer 12:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Eurovision Song Contest 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wes Mouse ✒ 14:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia

Please see Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2016#Armenia about Armenia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016. Eurovoix poorly translated the Armenian source, so they are not confirmed. If you readd them as confirmed, then it will be seen as disruptive editing. Wes Mouse ✒ 17:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eurovision Song Contest 2016. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wes Mouse ✒ 15:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria to ESC2016?

If you found that Bulgaria is going to participate in Eurovision 2016 please make a reference. Otherwise it's a vandalism. And as I read above it's probably vandalism, so STOP IT! If you don't stop it you'll be blocked from editing. Dimsar01 (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lunalilo Home

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 01:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Edrudoda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia talk:Edrudoda, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ^Avic _ennasis @ 11:01, 18 Tamuz 5776 / 11:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]