User talk:Bshehaja

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ysgol Glan y Môr, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bentley, you may be blocked from editing. Biker Biker (talk) 02:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC) please unblock me! i wont do the same mistake again[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

The method by which you may appeal to be unblocked is clearly written in the above orange box. You won't get unblocked unless you follow those instructions. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here [[User:Efanrees|Efanrees]] ([[User talk:Efanrees#top|talk]]) 09:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bshehaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here i have been blocked for too long now. i have told you my reason to be unblocked 2 months ago now. i know not to do it again. i thought of donating a one off donation today of £200 but then i saw i was still blocked unfortunately. Efanrees (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

1) I see no explanation from 2 months ago. 2) Offering a donation doesn't change anything. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The project is not averse to unblocking you ... you should, however, read WP:GAB to better understand what is required to be unblocked. Both you AND your donation are welcome to the project ... but one should never come with strings tied to the other (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove comments related to your unblock requests while you are still blocked, please just add new unblock requests to the bottom rather than replacing previous replies - I have restored it and will now reinstate your new request, below -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bshehaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here ~ i am not going to vandalise any page again. sorry for doing it in the first place.Efanrees (talk)

Decline reason:

Double unblock request; response below. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Totally unconvincing. I would suggest you retract your request and rethink the situation. Tiderolls 21:58, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been through all of your edits; with the exception of the first two, one of which may be factual but I lack the knowledge to decide, all are either trivial of outright vandalisms. If unblocked, what do you intend to do differently? Specifically, what do you want to edit about? Given your past history, a vague answer such as (for example) "I want to improve the encyclopedia" or "I will look for spelling/punctuation errors" will not be adequate. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bshehaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I will not carry on to vandalise wikipedia. The things i intend to do differently is to add information on pages which i know well, not things that don't need extra info. If i know the subject of the page well and if it lacks information i will add whatever needs to be added. thankyou - Efan Jones.

Decline reason:

You need to be more specific about which pages you intend to edit, and how you intend to improve them. Could you perhaps provide a few examples? Your previous explanation is far too vague. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bshehaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here~i know how to edit while blocked. i'm going to make another account ,too. i cant make a better reason for being unblocked because i dont know what page i'm going to come across and it lacks information i think the last reason ive done is very good. ofcourse you have a weird standard which is stupid. i know many other languages (about 10) so you wont understand the factual info i will write in them. i am going to get another ip address so you wont be able to trace me. please unblock me.Efanrees (talk)

Decline reason:

Please note- creating another account to avoid a block is not permitted and threatening to do so will not get this block lifted. As GorillaWarfare explains, you need to explain specifically the sorts of edits and articles you will be improving if you were unblocked. TN X Man 16:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bshehaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Efanrees (talk)the most specific i can get to is pages about cars or local areas.~

Decline reason:

I have checked through your editing history, and I was very much inclined to unblock you until I saw your threat to evade the block. That apparent attempt to get unblocked by using a threat, and the earlier apparent attempt to use an offer of money to buy an unblock, do not suggest that you have a positive approach to editing Wikipedia. I am still willing to consider unblocking you, but you will have to persuade us that you do have a positive approach. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bshehaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ~~i knew when i was writing that threat that it was inappropriate but i was furios at that time. sorry for doing that. i will repeat my reasons more appropriately now - The things i intend to do differently is to add information on pages which i know well, not things that don't need extra info. If i know the subject of the page well and if it lacks information i will add whatever needs to be added. I know the subject of cars well. And some local places or areas. ~~

Accept reason:

I, the blocking administrator (Daniel Case), and another administrator (Boing! said Zebedee) are all willing to give you another chance, as you seem to be willing to try to do better. I do hope you have a successful time from now on. Please do feel welcome to contact one of us if you need help or advice. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]