User talk:Fanyavizuri
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
WP:CITE does not require the use of cite templates. They are merely an option. I do not prefer them, because they make the encyclopedia more difficult to access for many readers and users (except that I find the book cites helpful, when book sources are collected at the bottom of articles). See also WP:CITEVAR. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't realize they make it more difficult - thanks for the guidance on that! What is the problem they introduce, and how is it best solved? I'm happy to adopt a better practice going forward, if there is a best one to adopt. Fanyavizuri (talk) 21:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. We can keep the conversation together here. The problem is that they introduce code that some users will be uncomfortable using, and they make the citations harder to read on the edit screen because the information is buried in the code. To solve it, cites can simply be entered manually, giving the info. required by WP:CITE: Author, url, title, publisher, date, and, if needed, an accessdate. Just put brackets around the url and title, like so: <ref>Ryburn, Stacy. [http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/solar-plane-lands-at-tulsa-international-airport/article_e6b25fc8-9704-51d2-97d5-de8b2fd6339c.html "Solar plane lands at Tulsa International Airport"], ''Tulsa World'', 12 May 2016</ref> This will end up looking like footnote 82 in the Solar Impulse article. In addition, if a book cite is given at the bottom of an article, then the inline cites to pages in that book can be shortform cites. For example, in the article Arthur Sullivan, a book by Michael Ainger is cited in the "Sources" section near the bottom. Therefore in the body of the article, shortform cites might look like this: <ref>Ainger (2002), pp. 25–27</ref> See also WP:CITEVAR, which says, basically, that if a citation format is already in use for an article, try to use the same format for additional cites. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the detailed explanation! I still like some of the automation offered by the template, but this conversation leaves me more inclined to use this direct citation method in the future. Fanyavizuri (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the detailed explanation! I still like some of the automation offered by the template, but this conversation leaves me more inclined to use this direct citation method in the future. Fanyavizuri (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. We can keep the conversation together here. The problem is that they introduce code that some users will be uncomfortable using, and they make the citations harder to read on the edit screen because the information is buried in the code. To solve it, cites can simply be entered manually, giving the info. required by WP:CITE: Author, url, title, publisher, date, and, if needed, an accessdate. Just put brackets around the url and title, like so: <ref>Ryburn, Stacy. [http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/solar-plane-lands-at-tulsa-international-airport/article_e6b25fc8-9704-51d2-97d5-de8b2fd6339c.html "Solar plane lands at Tulsa International Airport"], ''Tulsa World'', 12 May 2016</ref> This will end up looking like footnote 82 in the Solar Impulse article. In addition, if a book cite is given at the bottom of an article, then the inline cites to pages in that book can be shortform cites. For example, in the article Arthur Sullivan, a book by Michael Ainger is cited in the "Sources" section near the bottom. Therefore in the body of the article, shortform cites might look like this: <ref>Ainger (2002), pp. 25–27</ref> See also WP:CITEVAR, which says, basically, that if a citation format is already in use for an article, try to use the same format for additional cites. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Fanyavizuri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Fanyavizuri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Fanyavizuri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of The Mostar Diving Club for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mostar Diving Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mostar Diving Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Universal Hydrogen
[edit]Hello Fanyavizuri,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Universal Hydrogen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of Virgin Galactic launches
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Virgin Galactic launches, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)