User talk:Fedwa

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Main Page. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Main Page. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I'm a new user, and I just wanted to add a new article about Codendi,I didn't aim the main page. I posted it as a new article, creating a link from the "Comparison of revision control software" page. Do you think it fits your rules in order to be accepted by the community? Many thanks for your answer, Fedwa.

Articles for deletion nomination of Codendi

I have nominated Codendi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codendi (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Haakon (talk) 14:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Codendi

A tag has been placed on Codendi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]