User talk:Fiction Alchemist

The Bled edit

I noticed you removedf the statement about Dale Earnhardt's Seatbelt on The Bled. I added that because I felt that it added to the content confusion section. Just sayin.

And seeing how as you dont' have a talk page, in case nobody else has done it (I dunno how long you've been on Wiki) i'll say Welcome To Wikipedia! -^Violask8₁₉₇₆ 16:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I meant no offense by removing your edit. I apologize if I seemed cold and robotic, or rude. I have now heard every song on The Bled EP, and have personally confirmed that the person on eBay was incorrect. Thank you for welcoming me. I've actually been here for a long time, and aim to stick around. =) Fiction Alchemist 22:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea, definately it's wrong: I own the vinyl myself. awesome thing to add to any fan's collection. But Wikipedia isn't always about being true, it's about what's verifable.-^Violask8₁₉₇₆ 00:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is a year old (I didn't reply before because I just didn't want to be bothered), but I'm just going to point out that the guy above me admitted to putting info he knew was false onto Wikipedia, and I find that funny. Ha ha, or something. C.V. Reynolds (talk) 12:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would read the information i put on the article, i did not put knowingly false information. The article had been edited to say that people CLAIM that the EP has Dale Earnhardt's seatbelt on it, not that it is. CLAIMING is different than saying that it is. -^Violask8₁₉₇₆ 18:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geez... I apologize for my tongue. I didn't mean to sound so arrogant or nasty; that was an accident from being half asleep. I don't ask forgiveness, but I will ask: Are you watching my talk page? Because that's awesome. Anyway, sorry again if you're mad. C.V. Reynolds (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, i'm not mad at all - i was just defending myself. And yes, your talk page is on my watchlist - i add any user's talk page whom i message, so i can see the reply - i just forget to unwatch them again. No worries though, i'm not insulted or anything - i came off mad in my reply as well, and didn't mean to. -^Violask8₁₉₇₆ 20:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I didn't think your words sounded mad. I just felt bad because I thought I acted like a jerk and that you didn't deserve it. I did actually write that note originally having a point, but I submitted it and left that point off. Can't even remember what it was now. Thanks for not exploding at me or anything. It was my mistake. See you later, perhaps. C.V. Reynolds (talk) 06:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DBZSF!!!

Stumbled accross your comment on the Tank Discussion page! Nice to see you're on the Wikifrontier! --Kraftlos (talk) 09:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do what I can to fight the vandals, yes. It's good to see you here, as well. I'm surprised, but in a good way. C.V. Reynolds (talk) 18:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)