User talk:Fimbriata

B-day

Happy Birthday, teacher; from J. E.

Maxmordon 22:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Juan Bimba

Is funny that you translate articles from English to Spanish, while half of my articles are translations from Spanish to English (the last article I made it from different sources, check it out: Juan Bimba

Nice to talk to you again, keep well and healthy!

PS: Karen uploaded the Choresterol video on youtube, although I haven't seen it so far... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxmordon (talk • contribs) 16:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I know my English still has some flaws... I would happily accept to you to edit some of my articles.

Maxmordon 02:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

SVG

Inkscape is a good, free tool for editing SVG files. I would do it myself, but my written Spanish is a little rusty. Here's what I come up with, feel free to correct me:

Historia de la construccion de los templos de la iglesia SUD 1835-2008

1877 - Primer templo aún en uso
1919 - Primer templo fuera de Utah
1955 - Primer templo en Europa
1984 - Se introdujen templos de diseño normalizado
1999 - Se introdujen templos mas pequeños
2000 - Récord de 34 templos son dedicados

I'm sure there are better ways to translate the phrases but I wanted to know what you think :) Shereth 17:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Hi. I mistakingly reverted your Church Office Building pic, thinking you were deleting one...too much time in front of the computer :) Coincidentally, if you are going to add one, perhaps you could find a pic of higher quality. Consult Church Office Building and Commons. Best regards --Eustress (talk) 02:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BYU

Same thing with the stadium pic. You replaced an okay image with a poor quality image (sorry, I know you took the picture). If you want other opinions, perhaps try the article's talk page. Thanks. --Eustress (talk) 02:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		WPOR Award: Sponsored in part by the Big Gold Dude.
		You are hereby granted this shiny object for all your hard work at WikiProject Oregon! Thanks for all the photos of Eastern Oregon! Keep up the good work! Katr67 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Have you seen Category:WikiProject Oregon image requests and Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Oregon? Maybe you can fulfill some of those too. Katr67 (talk) 21:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uric acid crystals photo

Great photo, and long wanted! --Una Smith (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hello, I noticed you've made edits to Brigham Young University articles and thought you might want to become a member of the BYU WikiProject. We've recently revamped the project page and started a drive to improve BYU-related articles. We have a lot of articles under our project and would like assistance getting them to featured article status. Hope you'll join us. Go BYU!

Also, I notice you are quite active on the Spanish wikipedia. I started to translate the main BYU article to Spanish, so if you would like to help over there, it would be welcomed! --Eustress (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dermatology

Do you have an interest in dermatology? I could always use more help :) kilbad (talk) 14:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. If you are ever looking for ways to help, see WP:DERM. Thanks again! kilbad (talk) 14:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mycosis fungoides

Thank you so much for your photos. They are a great addition to wikipedia! In all honestly, several more close-up photos of the skin lesions, possibly with a ruler in the photo, would be great. Also, if you can get photos of the pathology slides, and images of the CT scan, that would be amazing too. The more images, the better! Perhaps you can try for a featured picture of mycosis fungoides. Also, if you are interested, help is needed developing the WP:DERM:PIC page. We really need a leader in this area. Regardless, thanks again for your work thus far! ---kilbad (talk) 17:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of skin-related conditions nominated as featured list candidate

I have continued to work on the list of skin-related conditions, and recently nominated it for FL status. If available, your comments would be greatly appreciated at the nomination page. Regardless, thank you again for your work on wikipedia. ---kilbad (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DERM:MA

We are making a lot of great progress with the Bolognia Push 2009. If you are not currently involved, perhaps consider contributing as we are always looking for more help at the dermatology task force. Feel free to e-mail me for all the details. ---kilbad (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. mgiganteus1 (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Maintenance dose, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dose and Clearance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Klamath Falls Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Portland

Modoc War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Williamson River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about platelet image

Hello, a few of us were discussing a recent change to the description of your image (thanks for uploading it!) at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Picture_for_platelet. Could you comment? Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 20:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. When you recently edited Aortic sac, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cell and Truncus arteriosus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your recent work on cardiology-related articles. Wikipedia's articles would be in better shape if we had more people like you! WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maickel Melamed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done-Bobjgalindo (talk) 03:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian Tom Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modoc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done-Bobjgalindo (talk) 03:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page for otocyst

Hi, I noticed that you created a disambiguation page for the word otocyst back in April of this year. As it stands, the page has two entries on it— however, each of those entries has three wikilinks in it, and one of those is also piped, both practices something which is to be avoided in such pages (see WP:DABSTYLE). Ideally, each entry should include only one wikilink, and each of those should not be piped. Also, I am not convinced that the different "otocysts" that make up the page are actually different topics. I am contacting you to ask if you would consider revising the page to either make it consistent with WP:DABSTYLE or, alternatively, to turn it into a redirect to an appropriate article. KDS4444^Talk 13:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done ... redirected to Otic vesicle. Bobjgalindo (talk) 20:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Moore Park (Oregon) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

on the West side of the park across Lakeshore Drive, each with paved ramps, restrooms, and docks.<<ref name=avalont /> Moore Park also has soccer fields, tennis courts, open play areas, large
the south and east, and strong habitats that ranges from [[juniper]] and [Salvia officinalis|sage]] steppe to dense [[Temperate coniferous forest|pine forests]].<ref name=rakestraw>{{cite book |last=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done ... bot is too quick to send message. No breathing room at all :( Bobjgalindo (talk) 19:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Klamath Falls, Oregon

Hi there. I was going to add this to the Klamath Falls talk page, but thought I'd contact you first. Thanks for expanding the history section of the article, but I'm not sure why you added it to this article. The etymology is about the region, not the city. And much of what is in the history section is about the Klamath people, or about Klamath County and places "20 miles" south. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. Yes, please move to the talk page. Your addition was great, I just wasn't sure if it was in the right place. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historic buildings in Klamath Falls, Oregon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages First National Bank Building and Arcade Hotel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick notes

Almost Paradise by Loverboy Lost in Love by Airsupply It must've been love by Roxette

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bobjgalindo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bobjgalindo~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Centro de Rescate Las Pumas

added a link pointing to National Geographic

Serpentario de Monteverde

added a link pointing to National Geographic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monteverde Theme Park

The article Monteverde Theme Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a travel guide. This park does not appear to meet WP:GNG, and the fact that it appears in travel guides does not necessarily make it notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 20:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serpentario Viborana

Hello, Fimbriata. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Serpentario Viborana, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fimbriata. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prospect State Scenic Viewpoint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rogue River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ice Lake (Oregon)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ice Lake (Oregon), Fimbriata!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Some of the information in the article appears to be incorrect - this lake doesn't seem to be in Douglas County, for instance, unless I've misunderstood the sources. I've removed all unsourced information until sources are available.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 01:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coquille River Falls

I'm sorry but you need to provide sources for your information. This article has a category that doesn't match the text or this source, and no sources.

I'm sorry but I have to ask-do you feel that are you mentally and physically fit to edit Wikipedia at the moment? This is the second article I've seen of yours that contains blatantly false information. Blythwood (talk) 02:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Lake

Thank you for your message and I apologise for what I said, I was rather startled and maybe didn't choose my words well. However, I hope you can understand my shock at these events when I know you've been editing Wikipedia for a decade - much longer than me. I don't know much about the geography of Oregon, and I know nobody can avoid mistakes, but I can read a map, and the second I saw an article of yours that said a place was in a county that's about four hundred miles from where Google Maps puts it I started to be concerned. If you are adding information "of eagerness mixed with little time", perhaps you could be careful to only add information you well know to be correct, or post on the Oregon WikiProject talk page that you think these topics deserve more work and that you would appreciate it if someone with a bit more free time could take a look.

As far as I can tell, your last edit after I'd warned you about these problems twice contains at least two mistakes:

You say the Wallowa River flows into Ice Lake, but according to Google Maps and Portland State University (see the map on page 2, which places Ice Lake at bottom centre-left) that river forms downstream and north of the lake, just south of Wallowa Lake from the confluence of its west and east forks. According to that map, no streams of any significance flow into the lake (Google Maps does show one without a name at the south of the lake), but Adam Creek flows out.
You say it has a catchment of 820 square miles, but that sounds like a lot for such a very small lake, and according to the Portland State University fact file Wallowa Lake, downstream of Ice Lake, has a catchment of 50.8 square miles.

Perhaps you can explain to me what the facts are and tell me the sources of information that you find most reliable on these topics. Blythwood (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Final Falls

added a link pointing to Salmon River

Frustration Falls

added a link pointing to Salmon River

Vanishing Falls

added a link pointing to Salmon River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (South Falls (Marion County, Oregon)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating South Falls (Marion County, Oregon), Fimbriata!

Wikipedia editor Reb1981 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great.

To reply, leave a comment on Reb1981's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Reb1981 (talk) 02:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Drake Falls

added a link pointing to Salem

Lower South Falls

added a link pointing to Salem

Middle North Falls

added a link pointing to Salem

South Falls (Marion County, Oregon)

added a link pointing to Salem

Winter Falls

added a link pointing to Salem

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (North Falls) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating North Falls, Fimbriata!

Wikipedia editor Nicnote just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A wonderful article as always!

To reply, leave a comment on Nicnote's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 19:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Awbrey Falls) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Awbrey Falls, Fimbriata!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article, and great to have a link to an online map. It would be great to have the dangers of the lava tube expanded upon from the cited source, and maybe for those who don't know about white water rafting, its terms and its grading terminology, a link to the International Scale of River Difficulty.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Clarification added to rapids scale: good eye. Thank you! Fimbriata (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Wiesendanger Falls) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wiesendanger Falls, Fimbriata!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The reference to the spelling on the plaque is a bit obscure if you don't mention the fact that many sources spell the name the other way round. It's implicit, but not explicit.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Added clarification with appropriate reference. Good call! Fimbriata (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Fall Creek Falls (Douglas County, Oregon)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fall Creek Falls (Douglas County, Oregon), Fimbriata!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could you explain in the article what a 'privileged area' is, please? As someone from outside the US, this term means nothing to me, and I can't quickly find anything on Wikipedia to help explain it.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Added link to Potential natural vegetation to explain privileged natural area. Thank you for the idea! Fimbriata (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Fimbriata, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 09:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fimbriata. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fimbriata. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments

Hi User:Fimbriata, it looks like you are creating articles on plant species. When you add the Wikiproject template to the talk page, please assign a class and an importance so that the article can be properly assessed. If you like, you can also add "photo-needed=yes". (As I have done here.) This will assist the Wikiproject. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 06:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archelological Site 4-SK-4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bucephala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allium ovatum

The article Allium ovatum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No current taxonomic database includes this name, either as accepted or as a synonym; the only sources given in the text date back to 1895 at the latest. A search of Google Scholar for "Allium ovatum" returns no results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomas Kofod

The article Tomas Kofod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor failing WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG, and WP:ANYBIO. See article history.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 09:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tahquitz (disambiguation)

Since you have previously updated a related article, you might be interested in knowing there is a discussion regarding the Tahquitz (disambiguation) page. The discussion is at Talk:Tahquitz (disambiguation). OvertAnalyzer (talk) 15:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rampart Ridge (Washington), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Lillian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy/pasting across multiple articles

Please do not copy and paste sections between articles without checking for accuracy. I've noticed several of your Washington lakes have the same sentence ("Julius Lake is located approximately one mile west of highway 2 and access is obtained by Upper Roaring Creek Trail #1584."), which would be inaccurate and against the Copying within Wikipedia policy. Sounder Bruce 05:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I should slow down as I write. All these articles get retouched with the right references, as you can see: they are full of references to support the statements. However, the excitement of a new lake article gets me at times and I postpone those cleanup duties. Again, thank you! Fimbriata (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I see you've copied data and citations from Glacier Lake to Cooper Lake (Washington) without checking for accuracy. Please address these issues before continuing to create new articles. Sounder Bruce 06:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checked Links corrected for relevant location(s). Climate retouched to meet the closest recorded population from Cooper Lake (Washington) using a webpage linked by Ronald, Washington, 500+ ft lower than Cooper Lake. The differences are so small between the reported by the ceb.wiki for Cooper Lake, I am going to go on a very short limb and trust their source. I agree: it ends in a NASA dashboard. The data, however, is so close, I remain trusting the ceb bot as Technically indistinguishable Until there are new numbers ... Fimbriata (talk) 21:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the climate data does not specifically pertain to that lake, it should not be included. It is not verifiable and would be misleading. Sounder Bruce 23:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No technical evidence Premature! It proves a power point and I am not going to wrestle you in your trip. You don't know the code the Cebuano bot uses, the variations between lakes are enough to agree on some potential extraction algorithm from the Nasa website they cite. In other words, you can't disprove their verifiability. Ceb wiki has great administrators and none have edited the bot, the articles, etc. A trust I have in their verifiability transfers well, it should always. Shared trust until (unshown thus far) data appears that contradicts these numbers. Thus far only a hunch "I highly doubt ..." is not a primary/verifiable source - far less reliable than a verified bot in a sister wiki. Have a great rest of your week. Fimbriata (talk) 23:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please cleanup after yourself before creating new articles. Marten Lake uses the same source as Anderson Lake, it has no talk page banners (which are left as a courtesy to create less work), and is riddled with grammatical errors. Also, don't shorten the Department of Fish and Wildlife link in citations. Sounder Bruce 21:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Colchuck Lake

added a link pointing to Eightmile Creek

Lake Augusta (Washington)

added a link pointing to Lake Ida

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Florence Lake (desambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Florence Lake (desambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 25#Florence Lake (desambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bald Eagle Lake (Washington), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mountaineers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rainbow Lake (Washington)

The article Rainbow Lake (Washington) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO and WP:GNG with almost no source coverage, let alone those significant in nature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 21:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. into Island Lakes. Fimbriata (talk) 22:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blazer Lake

The article Blazer Lake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO and WP:GNG with almost no source coverage, let alone those significant in nature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 21:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. into Island Lakes. Fimbriata (talk) 22:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gold Lake (King County, Washington)

The article Gold Lake (King County, Washington) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO and WP:GNG with almost no source coverage, let alone those significant in nature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 21:39, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree see talk. Fimbriata (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hompegg Falls

The article Hompegg Falls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO and WP:GNG with almost no source coverage, let alone those significant in nature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 21:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree see talk. Fimbriata (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Water Act, 1974

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Water Act, 1974 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://cpcb.nic.in/water-pollution/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 14:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shri Sanjay Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shri Sanjay Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Sanjay Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Soman (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rock Creek Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]