User talk:Fisss

Welcome

Hi Fisss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for joining the coolest online encyclopedia I know of. I hope you stick around. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. Check out the simplified ruleset. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines.

Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me on my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. Alternatively you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing 4 tildes like ~~~~. Always sign the talk page, never the articles.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing!--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 10:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Double poster

Hello, I notice you uploaded the Spirit Trap film poster twice, each of different file name. I've just tagged the unused file, Image:Spirit trap.JPG, for deletion in order to prevent duplicated images. Don't worry though, the other image, Image:Spirittrap.jpg, is still left intact. Thank you. *drew 10:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Alsou

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Alsou, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! Extraordinary Machine 14:39, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AlsouFHM.jpg and Image:Alsou2.jpg have been listed for deletion

Image or media files that you uploaded, Image:AlsouFHM.jpg and Image:Alsou2.jpg, have been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the titles of the images to find their entries), if you are interested in them not being deleted. Thank you.

Extraordinary Machine 15:15, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Amberroom.jpg has been listed as a possibly unfree image

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Amberroom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-Wikibob 01:23, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job

Keep up the good work and please pay more attention to the copyright status of images you download. It would have been nice of you to announce newly created articles here. Thanks. --Ghirla | talk 17:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lindsaylohan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lindsaylohan.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 10:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AlsouFHMGermany.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlsouFHMGermany.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Alsouburberry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsouburberry.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Pictures redux

If the pictures you downloaded are your own, please use {PD-self} tag rather than generic {PD}. You may want to add the date when you took every picture if you don't want the pictures to be deleted. Cheers, Ghirla ^-трёп- 14:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Commons

It would have been better still if you uploaded your images not here but to Wikipedia Commons, where they can be used by Russian Wikipedia and other wikipedia projects as well. Please consider this option seriously. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the time being, I have to remove your images from some articles just because they are too short and we'd better not to turn the stubs into image galleries. On the other hand, if you added the images to Wikicommons, they could be used for articles in other Wikipedias. Thanks for your work, Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

If you don't stop pasting copyrighted stuff to Wikipedia, you will blocked from editing Wikipedia. Copyright violations are not acceptable. I hope you will take this warning more seriously than you did the previous ones. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 14:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Apologies, I had to set a 12-hour block, so that you notice that people are talking to you about the same issue for quite a long time. mikka (t) 08:21, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Kunstkammer.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Kunstkammer.JPG. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:View_from_Hotel.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:View_from_Hotel.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 07:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Википедия не свалка

Дорогой мой человек, прекратите тащить в Википедию все то что Вы находите на рекламных сайтах по всей сети. Википедия - это не рекламный проспект и не прибежище для нарушителей авторского права. Поскольку Вы не отвечаете ни на какие запросы, не удивляйтесь, если кто-нибудь из администраторов Вас заблокирует. С дружеским приветом, Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright violations

You have been warned many times that uploading to wikipedia images without author's permission in some form is inadmisssible. Therefore all your violating uploaded images will be deleted immediately. mikka (t) 17:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. abakharev 21:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 21:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suburbs of Saint Petersburg

Hello. This is to let you know that [Category:Suburbs of Saint Petersburg] has been deleted. The reasons for deletion are as follows:

Category contents duplicate the contents of other categories.
There is no exact definition of what a "Saint Petersburg suburb" is. With this ambiguity, it is impossible to populate the category in a way that would be meaningful and useful to the end user.

I am also planning to review the Category:Moscow neighborhoods, possibly deleting it for the same reasons.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 18:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss dramatical changes to the articles on their talk pages first

Hello. This message is regarding the page Arbat street. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. abakharev 20:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Please do not center side infoboxes—they are supposed to stay on the side. Thank you.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 15:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kuznetskiy Most

Please if necessary create separate articles like Kuznetskiy Most (Metro), but not mixing in together the neighbourhood and the Metro station--Kuban Cossack 14:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baltschug Kempinski Hotel

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Baltschug Kempinski Hotel article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Stifle 22:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 48 hours for persistently uploading copyrighted materials. Please feel free to contribute to Wikipedia once your block expires, but please write material in your own words. Stifle 22:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most expensive shopping streets in Europe

Fisss, just to let you know, I've left a request on the above for your sources of information. --A bit iffy 17:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Veneto.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Veneto.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alsou100.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsou100.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Genidealingwithfairuse 16:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alsou Maxim.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsou Maxim.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 05:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alsou samsung.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsou samsung.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 05:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Alsou100.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsou100.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 15:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Theatre32.jpg

You've taken this picture from a website, it has been scanned from a postcards album. That's not your photo, and it is a copyright violation, man. At least you could've used "Fair use" tag. Ъыь 10:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fisss, I hope you understand that just because you yourself scanned a photo, it does not automatically make you its creator. Hence, you cannot release it into public domain. Please review your approach to uploading photographs. If you continue like that, I or the other admins will be forced to delete every single photo you upload regardless of where you obtain them or how you tag them. You may also be blocked from editing—blatant copyright infringement like yours is taken pretty seriously these days, and you are pretty much running out of your good-faith allotment. Best,—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 13:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Russia/New article announcements

Could you please announce your new articles on Portal:Russia/New article announcements? I'm tired of doing this for you. Also, please don't upload photographs you found in the web. Copyright violations may be deleted. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 16:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Фотографии

Fisss, я ценю твою работу над страницами о московских и питерских улицах. Только не надо загружать сюда картинки, выисканные в сети. Гораздо предпочтительнее загружать фотографии в http://commons.wikimedia.org. Ты сможешь их использовать в этом проекте точно так же как это делают остальные. Например, владелец сайта www.walks.ru дает согласие на закачивание его фотографий при условии использования ярлыка {{walks.ru}}. Я воспользовался фотами с этого сайта для иллюстрации Manege Square. С этими снимками у тебя не будет никаких проблем, в отличие от тех, которые ты загружаешь сейчас и которые могут быть удалены в любое время. Было бы здорово, если бы ты нашел время ответить мне на User_talk:Ghirlandajo. Удачи, Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Я бы еще попросил тебя не начинать новые статьи про московские и питерские мосты и вокзалы. Это, так сказать, моя епархия, и я планирую описать все основные объекты когда будет время. Иначе может получиться так как с Manege Square: у меня уже была подготовлена готовая статья на эту тему, но не было времени ее выложить, поэтому пришлось заменить все что ты написал более развернутым материалом. То же самое касается Tverskaya Street: статья готова, но когда дойдут руки выложить - не знаю. Во всяком случае, удачи со cтраничками о Бульварном кольце и о Садовом тоже :) --Ghirla ^-трёп- 18:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Birzha2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Birzha2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me

I hereby award you the Exceptional Newcomer Award for your contributions to the article about Saint Petersburg and Moscow landmarks. Hope to get more of your contributions abakharev

St. Petersburg

Hi. I am sorry, but I had to revert your edits to Administrative divisions of Saint Petersburg. Your edit removed all the links, making the article next-to-impossible to update in the future. Please do not remove or change the links in this article; if necessary, use piping and redirects. Thank you.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 12:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am also curious if you are planning to write the articles about every municipal okrug of St. Petersburg. If so, it's great, but I am just not sure what kind of information such articles would contain. If you are not planning to write them, perhaps we can unlink them to reduce the number of red links. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 13:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I appreciate it. Could you let me know when you are mostly done, please? There are quite a few minor things that need to be changed to make the article not fall out of the bigger picture, but I don't want to interfere with what you do. Also, please maintain consistency of districts' naming—do not confuse city districts and municipal okrugs. Sennoy District, that you have just created, should really be called Sennoy Municipal Okrug, Saint Petersburg, otherwise it is unclear from the title whether it is a city district or a municipal okrug. If it's hard for you to keep track of all naming conventions, I'll make corrections after you are done. Again, thanks.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 13:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your messages

Чтобы подписать свое сообщение, набери четыре тильды, вот так: ~~~~. Можно также использовать кнопку с изображением росписи в верхнем меню при редактировании. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On June 2, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St. Petersburg Bourse, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man ✍ 11:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio: Moscow-City

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Moscow-City article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Maiya 12:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

As of (at least) February 2006, all eighteen districts of Saint Petersburg are no longer called "administrative".—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 13:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow City

Hello. I noticed you worked a lot of Moscow City. I added a bunch of stuff to the site. I am just wondering if you would be willing to help me clean it up and add more stuff to it, including pictures. Thank you. XAKxRUSx 07:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:-boston night.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:-boston night.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Fontanka2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fontanka2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Fisss, I guess it is your image and you want to license it under the Creative commons attribution license. So I put {{cc-by}} on the image. If I guess incorrectly please fix it. Also there are many versions of the cc license (see Category:Image copyright tags) you might want to use some other variety of the license abakharev 00:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism in Moscow

Prease stop vandalizing the Moscow article.--Nixer 15:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please exlain your changes in the talk page. Please do not remove the gallery and other imagesd from the article.--Nixer 16:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule in regard to the article Moscow. Other users in violation have also been blocked. The timing of this block is coincidental, and does not represent an endorsement of the current article revision. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future on the article's talk page (Talk:Moscow). Stifle (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Fisss, uploading the image Namnlös3.JPG was completely unacceptable. The author explicitly said that he gives a few images free licenses and forbids inclusion of any other licenses. You copied his text and upload this image, doing explicitly what the author asked us not to do. I have deleted the image. Please do not do this again. We sometimes take the liberty to guess that an image is de-facto in the public domain and the author would not object to us having it here. Even this is highly controversial and each time is done on a good reason. We are certainly not in the busyness of stealing images from the authors who might object and especially from those who do object.

Also many articles, like Moscow already have quite a number of images. Inserting some images means removing (or putting into less prominent location) others. Please do not do this without some discussion on the talk page. abakharev 01:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Thewhitehouseinmoscow.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thewhitehouseinmoscow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Azov 22:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image sources

You need to source all your images that are not your own work please. Putting a link to the flickr CC page is not sourcing the image. Sasquatch t|c 18:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Tverskayastreet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tverskayastreet.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Primorskaya_Hotel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Primorskaya_Hotel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For me

Leisure and entertainment

Nightlife There is a vibrant night life in Moscow. The major and one of the most popular nightlife areas is focused around Tverskaya Street. The southern part of Tverskaya Street near the Manege Square and the Red Square area is known as an area with many expensive, luxurious bars and restaurants, and is considered being a playground for New Russians and celebrities.

Many prestigeous night clubs and casinos, such as Metelitsa located along Noviy Arbat street. There also many other different night clubs of various ideology including those for gays, lesbians and bisexuals.

Shopping

Tverskaya Street is also one of the busiest shopping streets in Moscow. The adjoining Tretyakovsky Proyezd, also south of Tverskaya Street, in Kitai-gorod is one of the most expensive shopping streets in Europe [citation needed].

The entertainment area around Red Square is the more exclusive. The nightlife focuses on the southern part of Tverskaya Street and around Manege Square, while the shopping destinations is GUM (State Universal Store) on the Red Square, on of the most exclusive department stores in the world. Tretyakovsky Drive is home to stores like Gucci, Bentley, Ferrari, Prada, Tiffany & Co and other luxurious stores. Another luxurious department store is the TSUM (Central Universal Store), located on the Theatral Square next to the Bolshoy Theatre.

Stoleshnikov Pereulok is home to Louis Vuitton

License tagging for Image:Moscow6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Moscow6.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:-stpete2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:-stpete2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:AlexRk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlexRk.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Birzha1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Birzha1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr

Fisss, я вижу ты стал загружать картинки, найденные на сайте Flickr. Как и с любыми изображениями, найденными в сети, с ними надо быть крайне осторожным. Во-первых, обязательно указать источник (source) - с какой именно страницы Flickr они были загружены. В противном случае, они будут помечены как unsourced (источник неизвестен) и удалены автоматически. Во-вторых, надо обращать внимание на лицензию (license) этих изображений на Flickr. Большинство изображений на этом сайте запрещены их авторами для коммерческого использования и последующей переработки (в лицензиях, как правило, присутствует сочетание nc или nd) и, следовательно, непригодны для использования в Википедии. По этой причине, например, было удалено изображение сочинских церквей. Следи за собой и будь осторожен. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 15:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For me

This page lists the most expensive real estate areas and streets by city.

Residental

Africa and The Middle East

Cape Town: Victoria & Alfred Waterfront
Dubai: Jumeirah, the planned Waterfront and The World
Johannesburg: Sandton
Lagos: Victoria Island

Americas

Boston: Back Bay, Beacon Hill
Brunswick: Sea Island
Calgary: Mount Royal
Greenwich: Belle Haven
Chicago: Gold Coast
Honolulu: Kāhala, Waiʻalae
Los Angeles: Bel-Air, Beverly Hills, Holmby Hills, Hollywood Hills, Malibu, Ocean Avenue, North of San Vicente Street, Sherman Oaks
Mexico City: Jardines del Pedregal, Las Lomas, San Ángel
Miami: Jupiter Island, South Beach
New York City: TriBeCa, Upper East Side
Rio de Janeiro: Copacabana
San Diego: La Jolla
San Fransisco: Pacific Heights
Toronto: Moore Park
Vancouver: West Vancouver
Washington DC: Wesley Heights

Asia

Europe

Athens: Kolonaki
Berlin: Prenzlauer Berg
Gothenburg: Majorna
London: Kensington Palace Gardens
Madrid: Barrio de Salamanca
Monaco: Monte Carlo
Moscow: Arbat, Kropotkinskaya, Patriarch's Ponds, Serebryany Bor
Nice: Cimiez
Paris: VIIe arrondissement
Rome: Parioli
Stockholm: Östermalm
Vienna: Alsergrund, Josefstadt

Oceania

Commercial

Americas

Asia

Tokyo: Ginza

Europe

Images

Thanks for the uploading nice images. But, you know we live in the society with complicated copyright laws. It is very important to be able to verify if Wikipedia is legally allowed to keep the images or not. Please, every time you upload an image specify the source and give some indication why you think the image can be used on wiki. If it is your own photograph please just say it. If you scanned the photo from a book - state the book. If you got it from the Internet state the address. If you got the image from a friend name the author and show his permissions. We are not telepaths, we do not know there you got this or that image. If somebody asks you about the source of the image do not just revert him like you do here or there. It is unacceptable. Also, please, do not remove free images to insert images with questionable copyright status. It only creates problems. Consider this as the last warning. The next time you upload an image without source, remove a maintenance notice from an image without solving the problem or deliberately provide an incorrect information about an image I will block you. I really do not want it, but I have no other way to stop this. abakharev 00:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bridgesofstpetersburg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bridgesofstpetersburg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Birzha6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Birzha6.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For me

search.creativecommons.org/?q=sunny+isles&derivatives=on&engine=flickr#

Blocked

Despite numerous warnings and explanations in both English and Russian you continue to upload images with inadequate source infromation and false copyright information. You leave me no choice but to block your acount. I see you have been blocked for this very thing before so I have blocked you for a full 1 week this time. You seem like a well meaning contributor, but if you contunue flaunting our copyright policies after this block have expired you will most likely be blocked indefinately. We would rater avoid that, so I'll explain one last time just in case you still haven't understood why your uploads are problematic.

When you upload images from Flickr linking to http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/ is not an adequate source, it tell us nothing about the status of the image you uploaded, just that Flickr have some images availabe under various Creative Commons licences, not all of wich qualify as free content (and Wikipedia only accept free content). You need to link to the image page for the actual image. For example for Image:Ostozhenka.jpg that would be http://www.flickr.com/photos/corrida/197267974/ now if you check the "Additional information" section on that page you will see that for that image the author have spesified "© All rights reserved" not {{cc-by}} as you claimed. You have also uploaded images in the past that while using a Creative Commons license used a non-free one, if you click on the "some rights reserved" link on the image page you will be taken to the creative commmons deed wich spesify the terms of the license. If it restrict non-commercial usage or forbid the distribution of derivative works the license is not free that can not be used on Wikipedia (except possebly as fair use, if it fulfill all our criterea). So please limit any future uploads to images that use only genuinely free Creative Commons licenses or other free licenses, and be sure to give the proper source so people can verify this. That way we can avoid this unpleasantnes in the future. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 17:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Balticstar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Balticstar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kuskovopalace58.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuskovopalace58.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kempinski2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kempinski2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Oldarbatstreet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oldarbatstreet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Socialites

Please refrain from adding any more people to your socialites category unless you provide a reliable citation (see WP:RS and WP:CITE) or unless the article already supports your addition. Please see WP:NOR. Thanks. --Yamla

Image:Patriarshy.JPG

Fisss, are you the author of the image? It does not look like a shot made by a digital camera: it is unusually low resolution and it does not have the metadata. Please explain. Sorry for bothering you, but you have uploaded copyrighted images without permission and the image looks like taken from a website. Alex Bakharev 05:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NuVirgos01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NuVirgos01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NuVirgos01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NuVirgos01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Veneto.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Veneto.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Moscow. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. _→AzaToth 20:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow is in FAC now.

As you have contributed to the article Moscow I wanted to let you know it is in Featured Article Candidates list now. --Hirakawacho 08:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moskovskaya Street

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Moskovskaya Street, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CloudNine 19:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Zurich_Dec._2006_046.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Zurich_Dec._2006_046.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Butseriouslyfolks 18:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jane32.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jane32.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 21:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Baltic Star Hotel

Baltic Star Hotel, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Baltic Star Hotel satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltic Star Hotel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Baltic Star Hotel during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Russavia 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BlestCD.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BlestCD.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blest32.JPG

I have tagged Image:Blest32.JPG as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blest33.JPG

I have tagged Image:Blest33.JPG as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JaneCD.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading Image:JaneCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Scathlock 22:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Rue Herengracht, Amsterdam.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rue Herengracht, Amsterdam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Herengracht.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Herengracht.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Strandvägen.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Strandvägen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:TORONTO 2007 - THE BRIDLE PATH.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:TORONTO 2007 - THE BRIDLE PATH.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Louisburg Square.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Louisburg Square.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Ipanema Beach .jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ipanema Beach .jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Shopping Street!.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Shopping Street!.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Via Montenapoleone.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Via Montenapoleone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Tverskaya street.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tverskaya street.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Cavill Avenue.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cavill Avenue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MoscowCity.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:MoscowCity.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stslogo.JPG

I have tagged Image:Stslogo.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Yauza2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yauza2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Clean_ponds.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Clean_ponds.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Sretensky.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sretensky.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Christmasboulevard.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Christmasboulevard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Petrovsky.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Petrovsky.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Strastnoy2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Strastnoy2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Theatre32.jpg

I have tagged Image:Theatre32.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Colonne_de_Vendome.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Colonne_de_Vendome.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU≈talk 14:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cosmoalsou.jpg

I have tagged Image:Cosmoalsou.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spirittrap.jpg

I have tagged Image:Spirittrap.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lukoil.jpg

I have tagged Image:Lukoil.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi. First, thank you for your many images on Moscow, and you've generally done a good job licensing them. However, there are a few issues I'd like to bring to your attention. Please do not put OTRS information when it doesn't cover that image. The OTRS ticket you supplied on some images did not cover that image. A single OTRS ticket can cover several images, but that ticket was very specific and only covered one image. Second, images on flickr that are marked "NC" or "ND" (non-commercial or no-derivatives) are not free enough for us. Please do not upload them. Also, please upload free flickr images to Commons, as the license can be verified, so that if the flickr user changes the license later, we can see keep it. And lastly, please upload all your free images to Commons. And upload larger resolution of your own works when possible. Most of your images were 640x480 or smaller. Commons wants large image. 5MB is not uncommon. If you have larger resolution image, please upload those. You may wish to move your free images here on Wikipedia to Commons so that they can be used in all language projects. You can use this tool to help you in moving them. Also please consider using {{Information}} on your image description pages so that people can learn more about the images and find them easier.

Whew! Anyways, thanks again and if you have questions or need help, please feel free to ask me. Thanks. MECU≈talk 14:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Gogol Street

I have nominated Gogol Street, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gogol Street. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:34, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Russia GA reassessment

An article that you have been involved in editing, Russia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Philipmj24 (talk) 03:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yauza Boulevard

You may also wish to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yauza Boulevard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

short

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Inc ru (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:City duma.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:City duma.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Russia

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found a number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Russia/GA2. I have de-listed the article but it can be re-nominated at WP:GAN when these concerns are addressed.. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronzehorseman.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bronzehorseman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pokrovsky Hills

The article Pokrovsky Hills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable unreferenced article about a gated community of 200 houses. Its not a town or a region or even a separate administrative. its just a group of 200 houses in Moscow. No separate notability...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Moscowsat.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Moscowsat.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:A Christmas tree in Patriarshy Ponds, Moscow.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tverskaya Street in Moscow, Russia (2006).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tverskaya Street in Moscow, Russia (2006).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baltic Star Hotel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baltic Star Hotel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltic Star Hotel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 21:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kempinski Hotel Moika 22 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kempinski Hotel Moika 22 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kempinski Hotel Moika 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 12:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pushkin Square 2.jpg

The file File:Pushkin Square 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear use/purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gucci shop, Tretyakovsky Proyezd, Moscow.jpg

The file File:Gucci shop, Tretyakovsky Proyezd, Moscow.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Namnlös99.JPG

The file File:Namnlös99.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ermenegildo Zegna and Bvlgari shops in Tretyakovsky Proyezd (Moscow).jpg

The file File:Ermenegildo Zegna and Bvlgari shops in Tretyakovsky Proyezd (Moscow).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Graff and Tiffany jewelry shops, Tretyakovsky Proyezdin, Moscow.jpg

The file File:Graff and Tiffany jewelry shops, Tretyakovsky Proyezdin, Moscow.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sankt.petersburg2.JPG

The file File:Sankt.petersburg2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of most expensive streets by city for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most expensive streets by city is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most expensive streets by city (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Moscow City" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Moscow City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 1 § Moscow City until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]