User talk:Fly787

Talk

Regarding ATQ-DEL-IXC

Hi,

I would like to know about the source of DGCA, please share with me about ATQ-DEL-IXC 649pardeep (talk)

Hi 649Pardeep, Thanks for your quiery. Currently, I am about to board a flight, I"ll revert you back with appropriate response regarding this within 2-3 days(due to my busy schedule). Pardon for Delay. I am learning this platform Fly787 (talk) 09:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Sri Guru Ram Dass Jee International Airport, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 08:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you LeoFrank. However my pretext for crediting those edits onto vandalism was the concerned user GkMand127 didnt gave any reasoning and did too many edits at a single time. If there is a reference need to be given for adding something,the same needs to be true for vice-versa as well. The OP didnt gave any reasoning which should be a violation of Wikipedia rules. Thank you. Fly787 (talk) 06:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, as cited in the message above, please go through what is and isn't vandalism. The editor was just removing content that wasn't sourced. Any editor can challenge unsourced content and remove it. In fact, from your contributions, you have been involved in adding a lot of unsourced content. Please go through, reliable and verifiable sources and how to cite sources. Remember, it is the onus of the editor adding the content to prove its credibility. — LeoFrank ^Talk 14:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fly787. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]