User talk:Frankgreen321!

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. GraziePrego (talk) 04:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:JoeJonas 1233 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoeJonas 1233. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature uploads without consent can be extremely dangerous as anyone is able to use this to create a legally binding document (e.g. They could use it to write a letter of support for an immigration applicant, which could compromise the national security of Australia, if that applicant were say a terrorist).

I have been removing the signature that has continuously been uploaded on Senator David Van’s page to protect his privacy. Since doing so, my account has been blocked.

I would like to gain access back to my account as well as getting this signature permanently removed.

I am justifying this based on the following rationale from Wikipedia:

If a person (or a representative of) requests that their signature be removed from an article some believe that the signature should be removed and the VRT team should be notified.

Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons - Wikipedia

I look forward to hearing your response. Frankgreen321! (talk) 23:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. The quote is from an essay, not strict Wikipedia policy.

2. The quote describes "a person or a representative of"- are you David Van himself, or a representative of him?

3. You would need to get consensus instead of just deleting it repeatedly. GraziePrego (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]