User talk:Frits van Houten

Welcome!

Hello, Frits van Houten, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Zag dat je bezig was met het alizee artikel, en dat niemand je nog een welkom had gegeven. Bij deze :) jaco plane 16:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alizée

Please refrain from putting content on the Alizée article, which is written from the POV of a fan, and please do not use the article for vendetta against other fans and/or anyone else. Also, what fans do or feel or believe should not be posted because this is an article regarding Alizée and not her fans.

As of speculation regarding her third album, it need not be mentioned that it is being speculated by fans and mags, as the two are inter-related. And claiming that no one else is speculating (as is implied when you say that some fans and pop magazines are speculating)would be too large a claim if you put in without any proof. So just saying speculated is safer than pinning the speculation down to a specific group of people.

There is also no need to specify what rumors turned out to be false. Because they were baseless and proven to be untrue makes them candidates unsuitable for encyclopaedic mention.

Please feel free to contact me on my user page if you feel there is need of anything which needs to be clarified.

--Soumyasch 18:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update on Alizée article

Your edit contained a lot of opinions, without any references, which made the section seem like not conforming to Wikipedia's neutral Point of View ideal. I tried to remove all opinions while retaining ALL the facts that you provided. I gave a detailed rationale on what I was doing in the talk page of the Alizée article. Please comment there if you feel any change was unjustified. The Alizée article is also undergoing a peer review. If you feel any change, regarding inclusion of contradicting info, non-suitability of info present in the section, etc, is necssary, PLEASE bring up the issue on the talk page to judge the merits of both sides of the arguments and updating the article accordingly. Beacuse all of us are working to make the article of an exemplary quality and its only through our combined effort that we can make it happen. --Soumyasch 18:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are several policies that dictate what kind of content is acceptable for inclusion in a Wikipedia article, including citing verifiable, authoritative sources whenever possible. If these guidelines are followed, we should be able to resolve this dispute. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:Alizée as this will help us resolve this dispute. Cheers, jaco plane 20:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alizée article

Hi. I saw that you removed two reference to Alizee fanpage. But they were put in as citations for some facts. In the few days you were away, the article had got slapped with an NPOV tag (please see this earlier version). The tag was removed and it was required, as per peer review, that five citations be put into the article:

but there is speculation by fans and gossip magazines that she is set to make a comeback in the near future. ^{[citation needed]}
However, another gossip magazine recently published an article claiming her to have supposedly cancelled all her contracts to spend all of her time on raising her daughter. ^{[citation needed]}
Alizée said that if her second album doesn't achieve sales comparable to that of the first, she won't do a third album, ^{[citation needed]}
Alizée supposedly had said that she was working on a new album, which would then be in a style of rock music. ^{[citation needed]}
Numerous other rumours regarding her possible third album have surfaced in the last one year, only to turn out to be false. ^{[citation needed]}

I provided a few citations (because none else did), from alizee-fanpage but not as promotion of the fan-site. I will clarify why. For 1st citation, I felt that rather than individually listing to all mags, a list of all rumors would probably be better. For 2nd and 3rd, I was waiting for you. For fourth, I didn't know of a better citation. And fifth, I felt, was unworthy of a citation, because the rumors were untrue.

This was the rationale for putting reference to the fan site (and also because I personally do not know which mag, which edition the rumors were published, so couldn't refer to them). Now that you have taken out the citations, could you please help provide citations? Or at least say what you now think of the previous citations?

And thanks for trying to get the citation from Mr. Hendriks. I will also be trying to get in touch with him.

Contact me if you need to. Have a nice day.

--Soumyasch 04:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Message.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Message.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 12:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:17mmnggbb1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:17mmnggbb1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Recent edits to Alizee article

Hi. I toned down your edits and reworded the section, still addressing your concerns. Have a look at it. --so U m y a S ch 17:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nymph.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nymph.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Message.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Message.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]