User talk:GPL93

Archives (Index)

2020 1 2020 2 2021 1 2022 1 2023 1 2024 1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Proposed deletion of Josh Gessner

The article Josh Gessner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Retired. Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Women in Red August 2024

Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315 Online events: New: | Women in film and stage | Indigenous women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (July, August, September) | Women in Sports (July, August) Announcements from other communities TBD Tip of the month: Check your athlete's notability before researching and creating her bio. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Draftification of Sikandar (2025)

Hey, I reverted one of your draftifications, as it violated WP:DRAFTNO, which states that any article cannot be draftified if it was created or edited in the last hour. You draftified the article within 8 minutes of its creation; won’t that upset the author? GrabUp - Talk 14:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

@BoyTheKingCanDance: I saw you again draftified it, don’t you know the rule? GrabUp - Talk 15:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Now I do. Thanks. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

@GrabUp: the author actually had already created the exact same sourceless, contentless, infobox-only mainspace article at Sikandar (Film), so I don't think they had any plans on improving the article in that namespace. Both articles qualified to simply just be speedy deleted, which probably would be more upsetting. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I have tagged one for speedy deletion; duplication does not mean draftification at all. Also, shouldn’t we wait at least some time to give the author more opportunity to add content? You can also tag for speedy deletion under criteria such as WP:A7, and draftification is only allowed after one hour. GrabUp - Talk 15:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

This subject already has a full draft at Draft:Sikandar (2025 film) and is currently a redirect at Sikandar (2025 film). Both article pages have a copyrighted photo (uploaded by the author as an own work) in the infobox, so WP:DRAFTNO is not applicable anyway. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

@Joe Roe: Can you please give us your view, if this violates WP:DRAFTNO or now, I think it still violates WP:DRAFTNO. GrabUp - Talk 15:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Both should be deleted for housekeeping reasons, particularly after finding the redirect and draft. There wasn't any proof that the editor was still working on the article, no template, no further edits, they literally just recreated it again in a different namespace, then they made an edit on an unrelated subject. There is zero indication that this article was still being worked on (which is part of the criteria) and, if anything the editor had moved on. We can't just leave just an infobox with nothing else and a copyvio to boot in the mainspace. Next time I will just delete. Admin Explicit did not seem to see an issue when deleting the redirect instead of moving the draft back. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)