User talk:Gailbrady

April 2013

Hello, I'm Solarra. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Gail Brady, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 13:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may find the page Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects helpful, given your choice of account name. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gail Brady, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lugia2453 (talk) 21:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently blanked

Hello I noticed your edit summary if there is a problem with an article about you please follow the steps listed Here instead of blanking the page. Please do not blank pages, editors often assume it is vandalism and will revert the edit. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 21:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gail Brady with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Wikipedia article isn't going to be deleted because

if you are notable for more than one event, you definitely have an article; if you are only notable for one event then it's touch-and-go whether or not you get one.
Aside from that, we only ever delete articles on notable people if they're slanderous and yours isn't (it badly needs expanding),
and I find it very difficult to take your request seriously when you have more edits to the page than any other registered user on the site.

Also, it is my opinion that despite what WP:PROUD says, Wikipedia articles aren't written indiscriminately - you must have done something to warrant one, and to blank one is just an insult to Wikipedia. To blank your own is downright thanklessness. But hey, that's just my opinion. The admins will only consider the three bullet points.--Laun chba ller 21:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]