User talk:GastelEtzwane

Open for discussion, when I sign in

Hi Folks !
I really try to answer all the messages left here. If I do not, please try again at fr:Discussion Utilisateur:GastelEtzwane.
GastelEtzwane (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Training/For educators/Setting up your course 3

Catherine Wells

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Catherine Wells, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Canadian Paul 02:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of RHINO (squat)

Hello, since you are one of the main contributors to the page RHINO (squat), I just wanted to mention that it is currently listed for deletion. If you want to participate in the discussion to determine the outcome, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RHINO (squat). Thanks, Schutz 11:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

de:Benutzer:GastelEtzwane fr:Utilisateur:GastelEtzwane

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EcussonFlorimont.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:EcussonFlorimont.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7

Hi there! :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 18:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of commercial goods allowed for import into Gaza

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of commercial goods allowed for import into Gaza, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=352356. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EduWiki Conference 5-6 September in Leicester, UK

I am writing to you as you have signed up to the Education Meetup at Wikimania 2012 and perhaps are interested in how Wikipedia links to education. Wikimedia UK is now running a education related event that may be of interest to you: the EduWiki Conference on 5-6 September in Leicester. This event will be looking at Wikipedia and related charitable projects in terms of educational practice, including good faith collaboration, open review, and global participation. It's a chance to talk about innovative work in your institution or online community, and shape the future of Wikimedia UK's work in this area!

The conference will be of interest to educators, scholarly societies members, contributors to Wikipedia and other open education projects, and students.

For details please visit the UK Chapter Wiki.

Please feel welcome to register or promote within your network.

Thank you, Daria Cybulska (talk) 16:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, will not be able to attend.GastelEtzwane (talk) 11:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

This is JL from Smith.--Lamchopt (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this is the same person. I will use this account now. --Amelia Paige (talk) 13:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm looking forward to it too. By the way, should biographical articles refer to the person in question by their first or last name? --Amelia Paige (talk) 21:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you mean the article title ? In that case, first name, middle name, last name. If it is within the article, it all depends on the style of the article. Usually one refers to a person using the last name. Just look up a few articles and you will see... GastelEtzwane (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Greece

Hi there! Thanks for the message you left on my page in Greek Wikipedia, and for your interest in our work. Unfortunately I will not be attending Wikimania 2013 (I didn't receive a scholarship, and I most certainly can't afford to go on my own funds). I would be very willing however to explain our project to you, it's not difficult to run and I'm sure 7th graders would do fine (my class is 10th grade). I could also talk to you about other stuff we've done on Greek Wikipedia: have a look at this poster I presented in 2011 in Brussels (look at item 12 on the list). In any case, I'm dedicated to integrating Wikimedia into secondary education and willing to collaborate in any way. Find me on Twitter @saintfevrier, and we can exchange contact details:) Best, Mina--Saintfevrier (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It would be nice to share experiences. I usally work by email, I hardly ever use Twitter. Just email me through Wikipedia "Email this user", and we can go on from there! Best regards, GastelEtzwane (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014
by CFCF

sign up for monthly delivery

Feature – Ebola articles

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

Just some of our over 60 translations:

New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

Some more stats

In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTT), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live (WP:RTTS)!
We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!

Further reading

Translators Without Borders
Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outreach

https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education/Countries/Switzerland

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GastelEtzwane. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Google Assistant article

Hi GastelEtzwane! I noticed that you added the Google Pixel Buds to the list of supported devices on the Google Assistant article. Since the earbuds process the commands through a mobile device with the Assistant app, I was thinking of leaving the product out of the list. Otherwise, the list will become very large and be considered a directory. Thoughts? Daylen (talk) 16:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see what you mean. I guess I was assuming that the Assistant app is loaded on the earbuds. You are quite right. Trim the list! GastelEtzwane (talk) 17:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done I was confused at first too, Google did not make it very clear at the announcement that all of the audio and responses were just mirrored from the smartphone. After the presentation, they posted an article about the subject: Google Pixel Buds Requirements & Specifications. Have an amazing day! Daylen (talk) 02:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I should have looked deeper into the specs and followed up on the later announcements... GastelEtzwane (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GastelEtzwane. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DMOZ contributor category

Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 January 25. – S. Rich (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GastelEtzwane. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mass addition of similar content to articles

Hi GastelEtzane, I saw that you recently added information about Project 2025 to a large number of articles. I think you have a weight issue. In your addition you cite two sources. The Project's own page, while certainly reliable for who are members, doesn't establish weight for inclusion. The RS media article doesn't mention most of the organizations to which you added the content. As such I think your addition fails DUE (or more likely BALASP). As a general rule, mass additions of nearly identical text are going to have issues with weight, especially if the target articles aren't mentioned in 3rd party RS articles. Springee (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Springee, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I am trying to find 3rd party sources for this information, and hope to get the articles updated ASAP. Would a list of organisations and individuals who are on the Project 2025 advisory board be a better solution? GastelEtzwane (talk) 09:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the content to the Project 2025 article would be fine thought it might be better to just link to the list. If a RS article mentions some specific sources then adding them to the 2025 article seems rather clear. It's less clear if adding 2025 to the organizations mentioned by the RS makes sense. The issue is establishing weight in context not of 2025 but of the organization in question. For example, the "____ University" might be a big university with many departments. That some group somewhere in the university is working with Project 2025 isn't really significant when we zoom out and look at the school as a whole. However, for a smaller think tank the inclusion in Project 2025 might be a big thing to them. Then it might be easier to justify inclusion so long as it was mentioned by a 3rd party RS. Part of the issue here is avoiding a wp:COATRACK situation. As an example, if we have a RS that mentions "____ Thinktank" way down at the bottom and only in a list then we shouldn't add a long section on their Project 2025 involvement including an extensive characterization of Project 2025. But if an article about Project 2025 say "_____ Progress" was the organization that pushed for the following platform items [items XYZ] then it would make sense to include. Basically each of these additions should be done in context of the article it's being added to, not as a generic bit of text added to all the groups on a list. Springee (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. I will try to figure out how to process the information, and how to avoid a wp:COATRACK situation. Adding a list of organization on the advisory board is a good suggestion, especially since there are now over 75 of them. Then treat each organization individually. GastelEtzwane (talk) 13:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]