User talk:General Dwight David Eisenhower

b

May, 2021

this is for may 2021--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Devil May Dance (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBOOK, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Devil May Dance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Devil May Dance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, General Dwight David Eisenhower! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2022 New York gubernatorial election, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. BlueboyLINY (talk) 02:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Devil May Dance

Hi, can you clarify what you mean by this edit on Draft:The Devil May Dance? If you want your draft to be deleted, you can tag it with {{db-g7}}. Otherwise, this book is clearly notable with reviews in The New York Times, Kirkus Reviews, etc. If you cite these reviews as references in the draft and re-submit it for review, the draft should not be rejected for lack of notability. Bennv123 (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, did you resubmit it Bennv123. You know I actually was going to resubmit it after I added your sources. thanks--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you actually re-submitted it with this edit (unintentionally, I'm guessing). I was going to review your draft myself, but saw your "please delete" edit and wasn't sure if you even wanted the draft to remain. Bennv123 (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think I remember why I did that.--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Devil May Dance article ready yet, Bennv123? I was just wondering because this is my first aticle so I'm a little anxious to know if it will become an article.--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 00:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per the automated message below, I've accepted your draft for publication. I have tagged it for a few issues, do have a look and try to address these issues if you can. Regards. Bennv123 (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Devil May Dance has been accepted

The Devil May Dance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bennv123 (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome General Dwight David Eisenhower!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 41,642,072 registered editors!

Hello General Dwight David Eisenhower. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!
I'm Mathglot, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

What? Nobody sent you a welcome message before this?? Well, let's take care of that right now! Check out these links:

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Mathglot (talk) 23:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

June 2021

Guidelines: JUST FOLLOW WIKI RULES. Thanks!--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 12:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Would a question asking about using a book written by the person you are talking about aloud as a source especially if you are talking about the person and how would you do that?--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 12:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You would cite the book just as you would cite any other book, probably using the {{cite book}} template.

We can't answer whether citing the book would be "allowed", since it all depends on "for what?" If you go to the reliable sources noticeboard, you could get an opinion from other editors about whether the book is a suitable source for the fact in question. It's not spelled out in advance that you can't cite a book by the subject of an article. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About original research

Hello GDDE, you asked about "original research" at Talk:Rockefeller Republican, and I wanted to respond to your questions. When we talk about Wikipedia's policy of Original research, we're generally talking about a Wikipedia editor adding their own original research, not a published source. When a source does original research and is published, that would be something like a new finding in chemistry that is published in a chemistry journal, or a Ph.D. thesis. You might also want to read up on WP:PRIMARY, WP:SECONDARY, and WP:TERTIARY sources. Encyclopedias like Britannica or Wikipedia are tertiary sources that rely on published information from secondary sources. Use of primary sources in Wikipedia is discouraged (especially in medical articles) but may be used with caution in certain circumstances. Original research performed by Wikipedia editors is prohibited. There is also a type of original research involving editors synthesizing material from two or more sources, also prohibited; see WP:SYNTH. Mathglot (talk) 21:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought it meant something else.--General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election

Hello, General Dwight David Eisenhower. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election

Hello, General Dwight David Eisenhower. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2001 South Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Special Election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:General Dwight David Eisenhower

A tag has been placed on User:General Dwight David Eisenhower requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muharem Bekteshi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Muharem Bekteshi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Muharem Bekteshi. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, General,

Please do not do any more "cut and paste" moves in the future. Work on the version of the article in Draft space and, when it is ready, move it to main space. Ideally, you should submit it to AFC for approval. But don't start a second version of the article. Right now, we have two articles on the same subject with two different page histories. This doesn't work on Wikipedia so please, stick with one version in the future. It really messes up our system of content attribution.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I shouldve known.General Dwight David Eisenhower (talk) 13:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehë Uka (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehë Uka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mehë Uka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muharem Bekteshi

The article Muharem Bekteshi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mehë Uka

Hello, General Dwight David Eisenhower. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mehë Uka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mehë Uka

Hello, General Dwight David Eisenhower. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mehë Uka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]