User talk:Gforce800
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Gforce800, and Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, your recent edits to the page Boeing 737 MAX has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media and cited directly in these articles. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have. See also Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing for help with references. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or . Good luck. -Fnlayson (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Travel Service
[edit]G'day from Oz; there are several problems with your edits to the Travel Service (airline) article. Above all else, your edits had only had one reference, which is the destinations for SmartWings, none of the other information you added was referenced. You contend that SmartWings and Travel Service are the same; as you can see from my edits to the article (if you take the time to actually look), there is another article for SmartWings and Travel Service destinations. There is no point in having the information in two different places, especially if one contradicts the other.
As for the fleet, you state that your changes were in accordance with the Czech aircraft register, but you did not provide a reference to that information, you need to include an appropriate link to the web page on the Czech CAA website; it is not acceptable to just state it in an edit summary, especially when there are other sources provided in the article that state something different. Now according to the SmartWings website, the 737-700s are in its fleet; if they are in the SmartWings fleet then they cannot be in the Travel Service fleet. The same is true of B738s on lease to other airlines - if they are on lease to other airlines, they are in those airlines' fleets, they are not in Travel Service's fleet. There is even a hidden note (which you ignore), "do not include aircraft on lease to other airlines". This is standard for airline fleet information. If you look at the changes I made to the fleet table, you will notice that I added a note to say that seven more Travel Service B738s are on lease to other airlines. Leasing in the airline industry is so commonplace that the details are not worth mentioning.
Your obviously copied-and-pasted your version of the separate fleet table for the bizjets and it had mistakes. You copied the references, but Planespotters has no information about Citation Sovereigns in its page about Travel Service. One of the Sovereigns is actually a Sovereign+. You also had a fleet total of six. I fixed all of those problems in my edits, and you undid those fixes.
Other information I removed was not referenced in any way; you added it back. If an aircraft is used for a luxury around-the-world tour every year, it needs to be referenced. Unreferenced material "is likely to be removed from the article" by anybody at any time. Have you read Wikipedia:Citing sources?
As I noted above, you contend that SmartWings and Travel Service are the same. On Wikipedia we have two articles for the two companies. If you think this is not the right way to have the information, if you think there should only be one article, then open a discussion about merging them together on the Talk page for one of the articles.
A general rule for Wikipedia (which is one I did not understand when I started editing in 2007) is that it does not matter what you know about a subject, you must have a source to back it up. Back then, I added a lot of content about Australian airlines that I "knew" from reading magazines or talking to friends or that I just gathered myself while working; most of my 'hard work' of many hours was removed, until I learned that what I was told by my friend who worked for Qantas could not be added until it was reliably reported somewhere else. In your case, saying "from the airline" in an edit summary is not good enough. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for File:Prague Philharmonic Orchestra Logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Prague Philharmonic Orchestra Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:PID Pražská integrovaná doprava logo.svg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:PID Pražská integrovaná doprava logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sprava zeleznic logo.pdf
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Sprava zeleznic logo.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)