User talk:Girls alouds biggest fan

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Surfer-boy94 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Good Girl Gone Bad, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. - eo 14:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Good Girl Gone Bad. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. - eo 14:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Good Girl Gone Bad. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo 14:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for you disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Rihanna's Fourth Studio album, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo 14:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - eo 14:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block.

-- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TangledUpCover.Jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TangledUpCover.Jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dannii Minogue's Fifth Studio Album

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Dannii Minogue's Fifth Studio Album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. tomasz. 11:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't Speak French

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Can't Speak French. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — *H ippi ippi 07:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Girls Aloud's First Live Album

A tag has been placed on Girls Aloud's First Live Album requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 09:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Template:Girls Aloud. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 09:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Tangled Up, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 09:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Open Your Eyes (Victoria Beckham Album)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Open Your Eyes (Victoria Beckham Album), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Open Your Eyes (Victoria Beckham album). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have unbelievably resurected the page again at Open Your Eyes (Unreleased Victoria Beckham album). It has been deleted for a reason (See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Your Eyes (Victoria Beckham album), twice now, stop resurecting the page! Celebrity-Benji (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Stephen Hams

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Stephen Hams. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. If you continue to do so, you may find yourself permanently blocked from editing.

Cheers. Sinclair 04:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen-Hams!.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Steven LOL!!!!!.jpg. The copy called Image:Steven LOL!!!!!.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Open Your Eyes (Unreleased Victoria Beckham album)

A tag has been placed on Open Your Eyes (Unreleased Victoria Beckham album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tikiwont 09:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Open Your Eyes (Unreleased Victoria Beckham song)

A tag has been placed on Open Your Eyes (Unreleased Victoria Beckham song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tikiwont 09:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 10:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OPENYOUREYES2004OFFICIAL.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:OPENYOUREYES2004OFFICIAL.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thehustla2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thehustla2004.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 09:35, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Victoria Beckham Articles

Stop adding fan-made nonsense to Wikipedia the way you constantly do with Victoria Beckham and other artists. I get sick of having to clean up the ridiculous mess you make all the time. Celebrity-Benji (talk) 08:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Celebrity-Benji (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Celebrity-Benji (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thehustla2004.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Thehustla2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Celebrity-Benji (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Open Your Eyes (Shelved album)

A tag has been placed on Open Your Eyes (Shelved album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Smashville^BONK! 04:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Open Your Eyes (Shelved album). If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Smashville^BONK! 05:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of I'd Give It All Away (song)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as I'd Give It All Away (song), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Smashville^BONK! 05:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Open Your Eyes (Shelved album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been asked numerous times to quit creating these articles. Smashville^BONK! 05:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of I'd Give It All Away (song)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as I'd Give It All Away (song), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 05:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Hustla (song)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as The Hustla (song), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 05:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Hustla (song), you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 05:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Since you show no signs of quitting. I am reporting you to AIV. --Smashville^BONK! 05:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I have took the liberty of reverting all your edits. —B o L 05:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone beat me to it. --Smashville^BONK! 05:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soxπed Ninety Three | tc db 05:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Thehustla2004.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Thehustla2004.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Thehustla2004.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 05:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Idgiveitallaway2004.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 05:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Myloveisforreal2004.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 05:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Trusilver (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should have been hit for a one week block this time, but after reading your last couple dozen edits, I don't feel there was any malice intended. You do have the tendency to be disruptive, however. Because of this you ARE going to be blocked for 24 hours. I have a daughter your age that is also an editor here so I understand that there is a steep learning curve, especially for a young person. I suggest you take this twenty four hours to do a LOT of reading on Wikipedia policy, then come back and make a new start on this. Have a good evening. Trusilver (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah your right I just want to create good faith edits, thanks. Girls alouds biggest fan (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you go over to WP:ADOPT. I think you could benefit from getting an experienced editor to take you under their wing and help you through the areas that you tend to get yourself into trouble. Trusilver (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I Will Try It Out :P Girls alouds biggest fan (talk) 06:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Control of the Knife

Hi. The cover art that you added to the Control of the Knife article is not correct. It is fan made. Look at the source itself and it says that it is fan made. Plus, the single has not been officially confirmed so please leave it off Wikipedia until it has been confirmed by either Girls Aloud themselves or Fascination Records (along with valid source to back up that claim!) ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 13:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Her Name Is Nicole. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Oxymoron⁸³ 00:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Control of the knife.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Control of the knife.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 00:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Control of the knife.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Control of the knife.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of A Web of Lies

An article that you have been involved in editing, A Web of Lies, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Web of Lies. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Kaci Brown's Second Studio album

A tag has been placed on Kaci Brown's Second Studio album requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 10:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Hook Me Up, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

_GB^T/C 17:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speak My Mind for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speak My Mind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speak My Mind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]