User talk:GlassFET

AfD nomination of High-end audio cables

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is High-end audio cables. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-end audio cables. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Upasampada

Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion — Preceding unsigned comment added by S Khemadhammo (talk • contribs) 20:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trijang Chocktrul Rinpoche for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trijang Chocktrul Rinpoche is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trijang Chocktrul Rinpoche until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncle Dick (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Classical mystics has been nominated for deletion

Category:Classical mystics has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Neoplatonist mystics has been nominated for deletion

Category:Neoplatonist mystics has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]