User talk:Godneck

G'day!

G'day there, Godneck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Good authors are always welcome on the project, and I hope you like the place and decide to stick around!

We've got a few pages you might find helpful, such as:

• Our "five pillars"
• The lowdown on editing
• A detailed tutorial
• Our house manual of style

It's all best summed up here: write from a neutral point of view, play nice with others, and don't let the rules get you down.

If you have any questions or need any help, my talkpage is always open for business, or you can see Wikipedia:Newcomers help page. Here's a tip to start you off: if you type four tildes (~~~~) at the end of any messages you leave on talkpages (like this one), Wikipedia will automatically insert your name and the current date and time after your message. Cool, eh? Happy editing! -Exucmember (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.Godneck (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Possible deletion?

Hi Godneck. I'm considering nominating Hak Ja Han for deletion. Would you like to discuss the issue on the article's talk page? Redddogg (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks.Godneck (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hak Ja Han Redddogg (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Godneck. Thanks for your efforts here. I mostly avoid the articles on the True Family because I don't feel like getting upset, it might be bad for my health. I have found that some good can be done on the other church related articles however. Blessings. Steve Dufour (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Nowadays, I didn't look into English Wikipedia. Especially, I can't see the sentence of number of marriage in Mrs. Moon's article. It's too shameful a sentence for Wiki Encyclopedia. I don't understand how that kind of sentence can be written in Wiki Encyclopedia. In Korean tradition, mentioning about the number of marriages of another person is a very rude and impolite thing. I guess it's somewhat different in English-using countries. Am i right? Anyway, I don't think that kind of sentence is adequate for any Encyclopedia. I'll try to edit articles in English wiki again. Thank you.Godneck (talk) 12:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

It would also be rude in polite American society. Clearly the sentence was put there in order to be offensive. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Godneck, be sure to make your views known about this topic in the current "RfC" discussion. I believe you also expressed the opinion further up the page that the number of previous marriages of her husband was irrelevant. People coming to comment on the RfC will not read the whole discussion, so you should summarize all your opinions and write something in the current discussion. It's too bad certain (no pun intended) people there are so rigid and seem to have no regard whatsoever for those who actually know a lot about the topic. I'll also say something there soon, but have no time today. (For example, I have asked repeatedly why the number of previous marriages of her husband was relevant, but I only got one response, an answer which was completely nonsensical.) -Exucmember (talk) 05:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. That's a great idea. Actually, nowadays, I am so busy that I didn't go into the article more. Maybe I'll be free about next week. Until then, I'll arrange my opinion and study wiki criteria more. Actually, I would promote that current wiki editors should consider more about the importance of the information, relevance with the article, and consideration of cultural issues especially on the article of autobiography of living persons.Godneck (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)